Summary

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich endorsed President-elect Donald Trump’s victory, stating it’s “time” to extend full Israeli sovereignty over the occupied West Bank.

This comes as Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu highlighted his alignment with Trump on the “Iranian threat.”

Tensions in Gaza and Lebanon have escalated following recent Israeli airstrikes, with regional leaders gathering in Riyadh to address Israeli actions.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog is set to meet President Biden, though Biden’s influence on Israel may be limited following Trump’s win.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        I really hated all the moaning about people calling out that both are shitty options. The Overton window is so far to the right. Like, yeah Harris is clearly the better option but neither represent any positive moves forward.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          For Palestine? Probably. In so many other options? It’s laughable that people think that the two candidates were in any way similar.

          Biden, and by extension Harris, have not waved their hands and saved the country (even if they could, which they can’t, because we elected politicians not magicians), but they have done leagues more for people than anything the Trump crowd has.

          Being ignorant of that is dangerous, but spreading that ignorance is borderline manslaughter for all the people who are going to be hurt because millions of people decided not to show up for this election that did for the last.

    • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      The Harris campaign made the decision to not break from Biden on Israel, at the cost of a +6 points gain. That’s the fault of the campaign’s calculations to ignore those voters, take them for granted, and instead run to the right with Liz Cheney and having the most lethal Military.

      I voted for Harris and told others to do the same. It’s still on the campaign. Blaming voters is just sowing division when we need unity and solidarity to fight against Fascism.

      Quote

      Our first matchup tested a Democrat and a Republican who “both agree with Israel’s current approach to the conflict in Gaza”. In this case, the generic candidates tied 44–44. The second matchup saw the same Republican facing a Democrat supporting “an immediate ceasefire and a halt of military aid and arms sales to Israel”. Interestingly, the Democrat led 49–43, with Independents and 2020 non-voters driving the bulk of this shift.

      Quotes

      In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withhold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they’d be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they’d be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely.

      Quotes

      Quotes

      Quotes

      Majorities of Democrats (67%) and Independents (55%) believe the US should either end support for Israel’s war effort or make that support conditional on a ceasefire. Only 8% of Democrats but 42% of Republicans think the US must support Israel unconditionally.

      Republicans and Independents most often point to immigration as one of Biden’s top foreign policy failures. Democrats most often select the US response to the war in Gaza.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Over 50% of the god damn country voted for a man who has so many major, should-be career ending flaws we don’t even need to list them anymore. If he kicked a puppy it wouldn’t even make the top 10 worst things he’s done. The democrats lost to the stupidest president of all time, a man who’s entire economic policy revolves around tariffs that he fundamentally doesn’t even understand and who cannot seem to open his mouth without lying.

      …and you’re here dunking on the people trying to oppose America’s blatant complicity in genocide. Well, you sure showed them.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 days ago

        Tbf the 50% that voted for trump aren’t here, plain and simple, so that’s why you don’t see engagement with them.

        The only political engagement you’ll see here on Lemmy shifts overwhelmingly left for all parties, so you’ll see mostly squabbling between various left factions.

      • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        6 days ago

        while youre busy opposing genocide, you got someone significantly worse elected instead. Well done.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Why do so many “moderates” insist on acting like the politically engaged people they run into online are the same people who are were so politically disengaged this year that they just didn’t vote?

          Like, could you please explain the thinking that someone wouldn’t vote and then keep spending free time talking about it?

          It’s not just you, and you’re not the first one I asked.

          But everyone else just down votes me for asking and never respond.

          • papertowels@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Well here’s a comment from someone I was talking to that was politically engaged yet arguing that folks might as well not vote.

            I’m not going into the thinking behind it, but it’s certainly happening.

            Being politically “engaged” on Lemmy doesn’t mean much in terms of ensuring voter participation. I’ve seen plenty of folks with a “democrats have to earn my vote” sentiment. That very much seemed to play out given the much lower voter participation for Democrats this year.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Did you link the wrong comment?

              What you linked is just someone saying they can understand why someone who thinks both party’s won’t help, won’t be likely to vote.

              • papertowels@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                someone who thinks both party’s won’t help

                I don’t read it this way all - there was no conditional on party efficacy and it in fact was an assertion that their lives won’t change due to who was elected, which changed the overall statement to read like the working class shouldn’t vote.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  So, the issue is you’re not understanding what people are saying…

                  You’re thinking they said something they didn’t and you’re getting upset about nothing.

                  • papertowels@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 days ago

                    Can you point out where they say “if wage earners think both parties won’t help”?

                    If not, then you’re the one selectively interpreting this…

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            6 days ago

            Probably for the same reason so many terminally online “politically engaged” people insist that they’re clearly morally and intellectually superior to everyone else despite the fact that all they do is whine about how the “lesser evil” (in just one of thousands of elections, no less) isn’t good enough for them.

            Maybe if you stopped focusing so much on the negatives, and started promoting positive change, people wouldn’t argue with you so much.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I think you’re confusing me for someone else

              I voted D like I always do, so have most progressive on here from what I’ve seen them say.

              What me, and them, have been saying is that Biden and Harris had our votes, but every indication show d they wouldn’t get enough to beat trump.

              It’s fine to be upset about that, we are too. Probably more than any moderate, we’re literally losing more than you all, that’s why we care.

              But what’s scary is this has all happened before. Moderates refuse to acknowledge they’re unpopular with Dem voters, and rather than reach out to progressives for help reaching non-votera…

              You all just seemed obsessed with turning more Dem voters away from the party.

              Maybe if you stopped focusing so much on the negatives, and started promoting positive change, people wouldn’t argue with you so much.

              The change we need is better Dem candidates, how the absolute fuck will that happen if we’re not allowed to acknowledge we keep running shitty candidates?

              Do you even remember how a fair and open primary is supposed to work?

              How is one of those ever possible if no one is allowed to criticize the party’s favorite?

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I really didn’t.

          Edit: meaning I am not American and if I was I would have voted Harris, not that Trump is not significantly worse.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        For some reason they still think they can bully people into voting for their guy. This has been thoroughly disproved but still they persist.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      She does, so does Biden, just not to the extent trump will.

      It’s fucked up the DNC insisted on taking support of genocide as a binary topic out of this election.

      Just think, if they cared more about votes than dark money from a foreign government, trump might not be president elect right now. That was always an option you know? Giving Dem voters what they wanted, not just on this issues but multiple others.

      Do you think the gamble was worth it now?

      Are you willing to do anything different in four years?

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        These people will blame us for the next 4 years and then blame us when the next neoliberal party darling loses in 2028. Anything they can do to deflect responsibility, hold anyone accountable, and prevent disrupting the status quo in this great race to the bottom.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Biden and Harris already openly pledge unconditional material support to Israel in its genocide, organize Europe in this same direction, and go after anyone opposing them on this. Israel receives what it materially needs to do all pf this. Any further escalation in the West Bank will be done with materials, funds, and diplomatic cover provided by the Biden-Harris administration.

        Biden and Harris feign empathy and try to run little games around redefining what a ceasefire is for PR purposes. But in terms of the basic reakity of supporting Israel to do whatever it wants to Palestinians, as in providing them the means they would otherwise nit have to do it, there is no sense in which they are less bad than Trump.

    • P_P@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      There’s a lot of stupidity reflected in these elections.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’ve said before (and will say again) that US elections are like our national-scale county fairs: idiots that your normally never see come out of the woodwork.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Harris did and does support genocide and if you tolerated that you should do some self-criticism.