• JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    You know, it’s okay to recognize Nintendo’s scummy legal practices while also recognizing that in this one single instance they are in the right.

    • Skates@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      There comes a point where being right doesn’t matter more than the fact that they’re cunts.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Well that’s not how the law works, you don’t get to violate it just because you don’t like it.

        That’s sovereign citizen BS, and that never ends well for them either.

        • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          You understand that arguments about the legitimacy of law is an argument about whether a law should exist rather than if a law does exist, right?

          There’s a difference between saying that someone’s “in the right” (which they’re absolutely not) and saying someone is legally capable of doing what they want. (which is debatable)