I’ve always been told that Hitler was a masterful public speaker; that his support can largely be explained by his compelling, if not mesmerizing hold on crowds. This narrative is not common, it’s universal.

Sometimes I think this is emphasized over how much the crowds approved of the content of his speech.

How do native German speakers feel when they view footage of Hitler? Do you think the reputation is earned?

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    Just read the comments, and have to add, don’t forget the mastermind behind his speeches. Goebbels. Hitler’s performance is for a native speaker of today a bit of too much anger, loud, and a rolling “r” nobody actually speaking in germany. It’s like a special Hitler-accent, if someone tries to speak like that, everyone know it’s about making a Hitler-Joke.

  • Onionguy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    5 hours ago

    In school, we never just watched a Hitler speech and were asked “here, have a look, whatdaya think?” It is always, from the beginning, embedded in critical, solemn reminders to see it as the darkest chapter in history. We (at least in my school education) were taught how easily masses are manipulated by emotions, groupthink crowd dynamics and psychology. How strong and blinding tribalism can be.

    So to answer your question, what do I, as a German whose grandfather fought in France for the bad guys feel when I see a Hitler speech?

    Anger for people who lose their capacity for rational thinking and let themselves be blinded by emotions. Anger about rethoric. And a deep unsettling sense of dread, shame and sadness.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 hours ago

      We (at least in my school education) were taught how easily masses are manipulated by emotions, groupthink crowd dynamics and psychology. How strong and blinding tribalism can be.

      Very cool. Wish we had more of this in my culture.

  • Muehe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Well for lack of a better comparison, it’s kind of like a Trump rally. Not quite, of course, the style Trump applies is tailored to the current American sensibilities, with his silly little dances and whatnot. But the way he wields anger and hate and “patriotism” to get a rise out of the crowd seems very much alike. And yeah, it’s sadly undeniable that Hitler had a talent for this. Greater one than Trump maybe.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m not a native German speaker, but I figure I should add some bit of context.

    Acting on stage is far different than acting on a camera. Facial expressions are exaggerated. The body is used more to communicate emotion. Speech is louder and more exaggerated. Most stage actors have to be told to tone down their acting when switching to film or TV because you can see more acting on a screen than in person.

    Hitler gives his performances as a stage performer, but we are watching his performances on film in close-up.

  • sasquash@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Short answer: Yes he was a talented speaker and a great manipulator. He knew what the crowd wanted to hear and he could express it very well. However, this is a great simplification.

    Longer answer: The problem is we view his speeches from todays perspective. The world now is very different so we can only assume how germans felt at the time. If you are really interested in it, I suggest to read some books from Erich Maria Remarque. These show from the perspective of the time how it could have come to this. Germany, once a proud superpower, was devastated after the First World War. The heavy defeat, supply problems, hyperinflation and all that struggle, provided the breeding ground for all kinds of radical factions. It was no wonder a demagogue like Hitler was so well received back then. From today’s perspective, this is not really possible to judge. The Allies knew that this could not happen again after the Second World War. Thats why the Marshall Plan was introduced, which led to Germany maturing into a modern western democracy.

    • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I agree with you generally, but I strongly disagree that we today cannot understand the perspective of the time. We (Americans) just elected Imperial Supreme God Emperor Trump based on the same fascist ideas that drove people to Hitler back then

    • kambusha
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Great author and books. Reads much like Hemingway. People in Germany were pissed about the conditions imposed by the loss of WWI and the effects of it. Hitler promised to overturn what a lot of people felt was unjust. A lot of emotion, especially anger, echoed what a lot of people must have felt at the time. If you’re in a tunnel, and someone shines a light, you follow it.

  • 5715@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    that his support can largely be explained by his compelling, if not mesmerizing hold on crowds.

    Don’t forget that there was massive propaganda to create this narrative, especially after the power grab for the NSDAP and Nazi movement.

    I think he was likely good at instilling anger in his temporary audience. There’s a lot of emotion transported.

    Also important to note: The 1933 power grab and the totalitarian regime in the next 12 years wasn’t Hitler’s work alone. The German electorate, Hindenburg and those who followed knew what they were doing.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Pushing back, I don’t think they knew what they were doing. Hindenburg and the elites in power thought that by granting a little power to Hitler, they could control him and use his popularity for their own ends.

      Unfortunately, like Keyser Söze, Hitler and the brown shirts were willing to push and push beyond what was previously deemed acceptable to get what they wanted. They were willing to take power by whatever means served them best: violence, arson, intimidation, grievance, and the country was eating it up.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We now have the benefit of hindsight of what Hitler and his system ended up doing, so when we hear a Hitler speech today, we know a lot more than the crowds who were listening to it at the time did; this causes some bias in answering this question honestly.

    It is true that his speeches are hardly ever boring. He was able to switch between a calm and an aggressive speaking style depending on what was fitting for what he was saying, sometimes within a very short time. This is true of some, but not all, other politicians too.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I wish I could link you the AI-translated hitler speeches, but they seem to have been removed from youtube.

    Apparently a bunch of libs were going “Hey wait he was right” instead of “Holy shit I literally speak of immigrants and trans people the same way hitler spoke of jews”

    The random meandering into completely unrelated topics is also fitting.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      50 minutes ago

      Edit: I was mistaken that Hitler was elected, thank you to Sem who corrected me below. Hitler ran for office but lost, and was appointed to chancellor by the winner Paul von Hindenburg. When von Hindenberg died a year after Hitler was appointed to chancellor, Hitler succeeded him and abolished the office of president and declared himself Furher und Reichskanzler

      I think it’s pretty important that people are willing to grapple with the fact that people will gladly buy into hatred and fascism when a charismatic populist sells it to them as the ails of their people.

      Hitler was elected*. If we want to avoid the mistakes of the past, we have to be willing to confront the reality of how they happened in the first place. Hitler spoke to real fears and anxieties people had, and promised things they truly wanted, like a great nation they could take national pride in once again.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Hitler was never elected in a fair election. He rose to power first through back room deals, and once he had the power of the state, he used it to influence the next elections and concentrate power.

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          49 minutes ago

          Thank you for correcting me, I was mistaken.

          If I understand corectly, he was appointed Chancellor by the Paul Von Hindenberg who won the 1932 election that Hitler had also run in, and rose to power as the successor to von Hindenburg after Hindenburg died in 1934

          I’ve edited my original comment

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Interesting, that wasn’t my understanding, looks like I need to go learn some more about that and see if I was mistaken

          Thanks :)

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think its an important question to delve into if you are an American right now. Some could use with some introspection

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If you’re drawing an analogy to Trump, setting aside the many other things that aren’t parallel, Trump is a terrible orator. I mean, most US Presidents are at least decent, but Trump is horrendous.