• BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Likening to an abstract hypothetical moral problem is very appropriate to the way you people think. At the end of the day politics for you is a lever you pull every few years and the catharsis or disappointment involved.

      By the way, kindly save your “I told you so” and “trolley problem” bullshit for after Trump has allowed Israel to slaughter a larger number of children than Biden did for the past 13 months.

      • ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        kindly save your “I told you so” and “trolley problem” bullshit for after Trump has allowed Israel to slaughter a larger number of children than Biden did for the past 13 months.

        Why wait? What happens then, you wave a magic wand and all of a sudden it’s rainbows and lollipops?

        • BMTea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          25 minutes ago

          What happens then is that I will be responding to a moral argument based in facts, and not a fucking hypothetical that may as well be an excuse for genocide. If in 13 months the Trump administration has aided Israel in the slaughter of another 100,000 children, we can start talking about how voting Democrats as “damage mitigation” is a duty to humanity. Until then I will try my best to assume you’re making the argument in good faith and that you truly believe that ending genocide is a moral priority.