Family wealth dictates our life choices. So is the Bank of Mum and Dad now behind so many of society’s growing inequalities?

Summary

The “Bank of Mum and Dad” drives modern inequality, fostering an “inheritocracy” where family wealth shapes opportunities over individual merit. This safety net often undermines social mobility, tying success to inheritance rather than personal effort.

Rising housing costs, wage stagnation, and unequal inheritance have entrenched this dynamic, with parental support shaping life milestones like homeownership, career paths, and education.

While early inheritances advantage some, the burden of social care costs threatens others’ expectations.

This growing reliance on family wealth exacerbates inequality within and across generations, highlighting the need for a broader societal conversation about privilege and fairness.

  • agamemnonymous
    7·
    6 hours ago

    I think that not being able to get ahead without parental help is explicitly a symptom of that.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          2·
          2 hours ago

          Upward mobility with the help of family has generally been viewed as common or normal in any family that could afford to do so IMO. Doesn’t matter if it was a car, used or new, to get a young person on the way to independence, paying for some or all of college, or chipping in for a first house.

          Must be a slow news day to attack that.

          The problem is the rising costs making that family assistance more exclusive while the rest get loans from banks.

          • agamemnonymous
            1·
            1 hour ago

            Correct. But it’s easier to assemble and publish an editorial about discrete symptoms than a manifesto on core societal ills.