• farting_weedman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The person was running a pirate game selling website based in surprise Arizona named the same as the username that they were posting and moderating (a switch piracy community) on Reddit and the email address associated with their Reddit account was the same one they used to correspond with Nintendo about getting stuff repaired which was sent to their address in surprise Arizona.

    Evaluate and make changes to your own life as you see necessary.

    • otp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hmm…is Reddit selling email addresses, or were they compelled to provide them by law enforcement?

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes, but it is also a bit scary / dystopian that a $62 billion company would go to such great lengths to have one of their own customers thrown in jail for using the product that he paid for in a way that wasn’t hurting anyone.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Welcome to the mundane, realistic cyberpunk dystopia, hope you paid attention to more than the flashy surface level marketing.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        He didn’t just use the product he paid for in a way that doesn’t hurt anybody, he sold pirated Nintendo Switch games. This is literally at the start of the article.

        It then becomes very easy to say he took revenue from Nintendo (the “they wouldn’t have bought it if it cost money” argument doesn’t apply), but above all selling pirated material is a shitty thing to do.

          • otp
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Definitely. It’s not even about defending Nintendo.

            I hate people who try to profit off of privacy when piracy is available for free.

            It reminds me of my university days when people would be selling PDFs of course textbooks…just email a copy of the file!

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I don’t think he quite did that, actually. From memory he ran a few “shops”, but these didn’t really sell anything and were just download portals to install pirated games directly from the internet (rather than downloading to a PC first and then copying to an SD card or installing over USB). However, I think he did take donations for early access to new titles, which would have been hard to get elsewhere at first.

            • enkers
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              However, I think he did take donations for early access to new titles,

              When video game companies accept money for early access to their games, that’s a sale. You give them money, they give you access. I’m not sure why that wouldn’t also apply here.

              From your description, unless you were allowed to donate $0 for access, that sounds a lot like a sale to me.

    • Lussy [any, hy/hym]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      i swear nintendo is the only company that manages to have people deflecting any form of villification, here or literally anywhere on the internet. Truly incredible, people really love them their pokemans and tubby egg rabbits

      • Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Pointing out what a moron this guy was is not the same thing as agreeing with Nintendo’s shitty legal practices.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Where was the topic change?

            If anything, you’re the one being disingenuous.

            “Pointing out what a moron this guy was is not the same thing as agreeing with Nintendo’s shitty legal practices.”

            We know what these corporations will do, they’ve been very clear about it.

            At a minimum don’t go advertising that you’re copying their roms and selling them. This guy advertised to the world who he is and what he was doing.

            Is Nintendo still shitty? Yes. But geez, don’t make it blindingly easy to figure out who you are.