• sneakyweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is why studying takes me 4 times longer than the average person. I have to reread so many things to make it sync in. It annoys me how somone can just look or read something once and they have it already

  • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I did find this paper where somebody used the term “mindless reading”

    Smallwood, J. (2011). Mind‐wandering while reading: attentional decoupling, mindless reading and the cascade model of inattention. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00263.x

    Seems that is the term used for it such as this talk in 2006

    https://ies.ed.gov/director/conferences/06ies_conference/posters/readingtq_reichle.asp

    Abstract: “Mindless reading” occurs when, during reading, our eyes continue to move across the printed page in spite of the fact that we are busy thinking about things that are often completely unrelated to the text.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 days ago

    Back when I came into the office every day, it was a 45-minute commute. At least one day every week, I had no active memory of getting from the north side of the beltway to my house (about 20-25 minutes). I’d reach this point, and it was like someone flipped a switch, and I became aware that I existed.

    I’ve done this with Audio Books. I’ve listened to 2-3 chapters, and they’ll mention an assassin; Brain goes, wait, assassin? WHAT ASSASSIN? I start rolling back find out I completely tuned out 20 minutes of the story.

    • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is why I can’t listen to audio books. I just get lost in the soothing voice and my mind wonders. Paper books are where it’s at.

      • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Podcasts and technology connections on YouTube. I totally enjoy them, but if I’m halfway tired and my mind doesn’t want to focus and I put either on, I’m passing out after 10 minutes.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yea but then you realize that you have now made the audiobook last 30mins longer, so it’s a win… especially if it’s a good book.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Thank god this relatable to so many of us, I was wondering if this was a symptom of a larger disorder whenever this happens to me.

    The worst is when I’m reciting word for word technical information about chemistry or physics, because I often like to explain how things work to friends and family while I work on stuff, and then I’ll get interrupted or distracted and have no memory of wtf I was just saying for the last several minutes straight.

  • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I call it “reading with my eyes but not my brain”, but I’m one of those weirdos who doesn’t think you need to turn every god damned niche thing into a new word or initialism just to gatekeep against those who didn’t know the new word just made up.

        • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Because it’s easier to refer to something with a single word or abbreviation than to have to explain the entire concept?

          It’s more slang than jargon either way.

          • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Slang is informal language, jargon is a specialized term. This post is asking for jargon. Slang is designed to keep people out of a social in-group, jargon is designed to keep people out of an intellectual in-group.

    • ayyy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 days ago

      Attentiondefißithyperactivitydißorder

        • ayyy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 days ago

          True, but I only get so many opportunities to use that silly ß

        • socsa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          As an ADHD person, sight reading is actually my shitty superpower. I don’t understand it, but my difficulty is just starting the book. But once I’m in it’s pure hyper focus.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        More like Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung.

        By the way, using the ‘ß’ as you did would force the preceding vowel to have a stretched pronunciation.

        And I don’t know about you, but in my opinion defeeßit and deeßorder sounds awful.

        • daed
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That conversation looked like bots anyway

    • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It 's not that long, I think it is called “Leselücke” (reading gap).

      If you want, you could call it “Lesegedankenwanderungsamnesie” (reading wandering thought amnesia) 🤔

    • xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ll bet there is - some of my friends call it “Leseschlaf” (reading sleep), which seems fitting.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I think it could be argued for a state of hypnosis, like how people drive for miles but just don’t remember how they did it entirely.

    Difference is, you clearly drove and got there safely. You didn’t read the words on the page, you just moved your eyes across ink blots.

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I was a professional driver for 20 years. I can attest that autopilot is a real thing.

      It’s easy to monitor traffic on either side but end up daydreaming and miss a turn.

      I’ve been out of the transport industry for five years now and I still occasionally find myself auto-piloting to places I used to deliver to. It’s so weird.

      • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I drove black cars for a bit, I’ve definitely just taken the airport exit once when I was out of it. Glad I’m not alone.

        • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Yeah. It’s not a big deal, but how you handle it really matters. (This is advice for anyone else reading; I’m sure you know.)

          If you miss your turn because you’re daydreaming or whatever, just keep going. DO NOT swerve three lanes over to an exit or whatever other dumb shit. You fucked up. Deal with it without putting other people in danger.