• Varyk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      right, let’s count manually.

      Just to make sure.

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, I think it’d be good to select a handful of the most statistically unlikely outcomes and hand recount, if for no other reason than to put these rumours to bed.

        • Varyk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          4 years ago, we know for sure because conspirators in the fake elector scheme have talked to the doj and the FBI that they tried to steal the presidential election by manipulating votes.

          2 years after that, Trump’s lawyers had people steal the software from the voting machines that 90% of voters in those swing States used.

          so a bunch of computer scientists are saying hey. they literally already tried to do it and failed, let’s make sure they didn’t try and succeed this time.

          it’s more than an outlandish theory, it’s voting manipulation that we know has already happened and we know could happen again, except this time they have had the voting software for 3 years