- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
The source is misleading: https://lemmy.world/post/22317681
“misleading” but still way more bullet ballots than there should be. Most of this is admittedly a hypothesis on what exactly the data means/how it happened, but that data can’t be ignored just bc he was slightly off
Do the voting machines even have the hardware to connect to the internet? Also if the software was modified it should be possible to pull an image from a compromised machine to compare it to the official version of the software.
I don’t see any evidence being presented here, just theories of how fraud could have happened which is the same way I felt when people cried foul in 2020. Theories without evidence.
Oh cool, we’re doing 2020 but blue.
Pointing out super suspicious things about the election is not comparable to denying the results with literally no evidence
Yeah, you’re just using a misleading source to push a supposition. So much better. Next tell me that you’re ‘just asking questions’ about the election.
Why do you want so badly to let trump get away with cheating? Do you genuinely trust that he won the election fair and square when he straight up tried bribing governors to win the last election? There’s more than enough evidence to warrant an investigation, so why oppose it?
How many ‘should’ there be?
Around 1%. The numbers reported here and corrected by Snopes are a lot higher than that
Edit fixed a typo
