Labelling in the EU is meant to give consumers accurate and honest information on the contents of their food so they can make informed decisions about what they are buying. But due to gaps in EU rules consumers can easily get “lost in a maze” of puzzling claims, according to the European Court of Auditors (ECA).

Instead of bringing clarity, food labels too often create confusion; there are hundreds of different schemes, logos and claims that people need to decipher,” said Keit Pentus-Rosimannus, an ECA auditor. “Companies can be very creative in what they put on packaging, and EU rules have not caught up with a constantly evolving market, leaving some 450 million European consumers vulnerable to intentionally or unintentionally misleading messages.”

EU rules require producers to list ingredients, allergens and other mandatory information on food packages. Firms can then add voluntary statements including nutrition and health claims – such as “source of Omega-3 fatty acids” or “calcium is necessary to maintain healthy teeth”.

Here the picture gets muddier, according to the 27-nation bloc’s spending watchdog, as current rules allow businesses to zoom in on the more flattering features of their products and gloss over other aspects. An energy bar with lots of sugar can for example be branded simply as “high in protein” and a fatty orange cookie as a “source of fibre”, according to the report.

Even when such claims are false, checks and penalties are weak and almost non-existent for online food sales, it said. Health claims related to plant-substances or “botanicals” are not yet regulated at EU level, which leaves consumers potentially exposed to assertions not supported by science, the auditors added. Similarly, there is no EU definition of what “vegan” and “vegetarian” mean, although private certification schemes exist. Finally, different “front-of-pack nutrition labelling” schemes such as Nutri-Score and Keyhole, which aim at helping shoppers identify healthier food options, are in use in different countries, adding to the confusion, the ECA said.

European consumer rights group Foodwatch is pushing for Nutri-Score, currently used in France, Germany and a handful other countries, to be adopted across the bloc.

The ECA urged the European Commission to take a number of steps including addressing the gaps in the EU legal framework, and strengthening member states’ checks on voluntary labels and online retail.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Do EU goods have a nutrition label similar to the US? Pretty easy to look at the ingredients here as well as percentages of things like protein, fiber, fat, and added sugars.

    • Misspelledusernme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They do. But one thing that bugs me about the nutrition labels in the US is that they show “amount per serving”, rather than per 100ml or per 100g, which they have in the EU (at least in Sweden). it makes it a step harder to compare nutrition labels in the US.

      I also feel judged when they tell me a bag of chips contains many servings.

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    European consumer rights group Foodwatch is pushing for Nutri-Score, currently used in France, Germany and a handful other countries, to be adopted across the bloc.

    Nutri-Score is kinda useless. The score isn’t based on overall healthiness, it’s based on how healthy something is within its group. The group isn’t listed anywhere and its unclear what’s in there. You could find a frozen pizza with a higher rating than hummus or soft drinks being rated the same as bottled water. I don’t even notice the score anymore, I go straight to the ingredients and nutrition table.

    • biber@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think your post could be misleading. Iirc there are three categories, drinks, food and milk-stuff. So you can absolutely compare frozen pizza with hummus, and maybe the frozen pizza has more protein and the hummus more fat.

      The algorithm is on Wikipedia

      Ps: I might also be wrong, but this is how I remember :)

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    This is how I shop for food, and how I dropped 110 lbs 15 years ago:

    1/ Look at the food:

    • If you recognize a fruit, veggie or egg, it’s unprocessed.
    • If you recognize a basic foodstuff like bread, butter, it’s semi-processed.
    • If you don’t recognize the food, it’s ultra-processed.

    2/ Only buy unprocessed or semi-processed food. The more processed, the less you should buy it. If it’s unprocessed, favor green veggies over tubers and nuts, and avoid fruits with too much sugar. If it’s semi-processed, stay away from stuff that has fat or refined sugar in it as much as possible.

    3/ Always read the calories label. Only one metric matters: kcal / 100g. Forget “per serving” and other deceitful metrics. If it’s under 180 kcal / 100g, it’s okay. If it’s under 250 kcal / 100g, start looking for alternatives: the other brand right next to it on the shelf might have massively fewer or more calories for the same products for no discernable reason - a good rule of thumb is: store brands often have fewer calories than brand names. If it’s over 250 kcal / 100g, avoid, with one exception: if it’s a powerful condiment that requires very little to flavor food, like mustard, it’s okay.

    4/ Ban refined sugar - incl. juices - fat in all its forms (butter, oil…) and limit meat to once a week (a Sunday treat for example).

  • xiaoOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    For those who want to learn more about the Nutri-Score

    https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/IARC_Evidence_Summary_Brief_2.pdf

    Publication bias and Nutri-Score: A complete literature review of the substantiation of the effectiveness of the front-of-pack logo Nutri-Score

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213434424000069

    Report: Why the European Commission must choose the Nutri-Score nutrition label

    https://unescochair-ghe.org/2023/05/12/report-why-the-european-commission-must-choose-the-nutri-score-nutrition-label/