• C126
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    You know spending money doesn’t make it vanish into the air right? Someone else has the 6.2 million, and it can still help kids with cancer.

    • Modva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I never thought I’d ever see someone argue against helping kids with cancer DIRECTLY when we have excess in the palm our hands, and yet here we are.

        • Napdyn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No you plant the banana and let it multiply so you can dig them up in the warm season and feed many

            • recapitated@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              55 minutes ago

              One time I ate a banana, and ever since then I keep shitting out brown bananas. It’s been years.

            • Napdyn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah you put them in the ground and then the flowers bloom on the tap root that comes out the end of the banana. They are then fertilised by earth worms and once the bananas ripen you then pull them out as the bunch we all know and love.

      • C126
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You’re mad at the wrong person. He only has a banana. The banana “artist” has $6.2 million now. Why aren’t they helping kids with cancer? I suggest you go yell at them.

        • Susaga
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Do you think someone spends $6.2 million on fruit if they don’t have an extra few million? He had $6.2 million at MINIMUM, and he chose to eat a banana instead of healing children.

          I think it’s perfectly fair to be mad at a person for the actions they took.

          • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            He had $6.2 million at MINIMUM

            According to this great reporting by Protos, he holds over $580,000,000 in just Bitcoin, with tens (and sometimes hundreds) of millions in other assets, like TRON (the coin you can see promoted on the side of his microphone in the article’s photo) which is a clone of the Ethereum blockchain he made by simply copying the code, artificially lowering fees, then publishing it as if he created it.

            Not only is he a rich douchebag, but he’s also a plagiarist.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Some gifter who managed to convince the world that a banana was worth 6.2 million dollars has that money. They won’t be helping anyone but themselves.

      I hope crypto-bro stole that 6.2 million from a cartel, and his next video involves people with machetes showing him how they feel about it.

      • Decoy321@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s even worse than that. The banana isn’t the actual thing valued at that price. It’s the exhibit, an abstract arbitrary concept. The banana and duct tape get replaced periodically. This person is just eating a banana for the attention.

    • Steve@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same argument about wasting 44 billion to buy twitter.

      A useless website exchanged hands.

      Someone still has the money, why dont they spend it on the poor?