• frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      108
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Can we though? Are you thinking of the shareholders at all?!? Someone’s going to have a tough time having only 4 holiday homes to choose from… 😬

      • chingadera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        JUST 4? ARE YOU INSANE?

        First of all two of those are under a cold front right now, and one of them is having maintenance done in the West courtyard (noisy from 3pm-3:30pm if you are within 6 bedrooms of it, which I assure you, we won’t be) and the fourth one we were just at 2 years ago so it’s a little much to vacation there again that soon.

        Please think before you speak.

        • frunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          My apologies and condolences for any tribulations my thoughtfulness may have bestowed upon you. In my haste to protect my interests and that of my colleagues, i spoke before fully considering the gravity of my statements 🫠

      • Ookami38
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Generally the only thing I think about shareholders is feeding them into a grinder feet first.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s the NYC Subway. It’s not a company, it’s government mass transit. They had big problems with homeless people harassing people and the cops weren’t doing much. Ridership was dropping. So they did the only thing they could do.

        It sucks, but what do you expect from the subway? A solution to homeless people? It’s for getting people to where they want to go, not for being a shelter.

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Keep the benches, and pressure the system to help house and treat the underlying issues of homelessness.

          • ArbitraryValue
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            New York City already provides shelter space for anyone who asks. It’s the city’s obligation according to the state constitution. (This is one reason why so many migrants came to NYC.) The homeless people in the subway system generally don’t want to go to a shelter.

            As for treating the underlying issues: many of these people are either schizophrenics or drug addicts. There’s no straightforward treatment for either condition.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                If the solution was as easy as you think it is, someone would have already done it.

                • PunnyName@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It doesn’t make profits, that’s why people haven’t done it. They’ll bend over backwards to help if it’s insanely profitable. Short term profits, to be exact

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The fact that anyone disagreed with you is a sign of how problematic this country is.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Im thinking what happens if the people that are not homeless sue the city for a lack of areas to sit down? Regular people. Tired people. People just waiting. Disabled people. Elderly. Pregnant. Etc

      • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        Then that lawsuit will be paid with tax money, and the new benches will be of hostile design with extra spikes below them just to make sure the homeless won’t come. Also they might “feel pressured” to employ a “security” guard that regularly kicks out the homeless in increasingly cruel fashion. For safety reasons, of course.

        Doesn’t mean you shouldn’t do it, only that the current decision makers won’t stop to be ass hats. They need their asses kicked.

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Security guards because the cops are busy shooting at people that try to ride without a ticket.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That may be how that altercation started, but it’s pretty dishonest to say that’s why they shot at him.

    • Pasta Dental
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      The problem is this only works in areas where the homeless aren’t a majority of drug addicts. In North America this is infeasable they will piss and leave syringes everywhere. This just creates avoidable work for the people cleaning out this stuff.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Then you don’t want to remove benches. You want, at very least, some kind of shelter system, Supervised Injection Sites, and an adequate social security and healthcare system to support those that are ready to quit their addiction.

        Removing the benches from public transport stations just spreads out the problem.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        If only we would think of things to help house the homeless, instead of seeing them as a nuisance.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s so fucking annoying when people say shit like this as if other countries (even some cities in the US) haven’t had this figured out for years at this point. Do like the minimum amount of research.