A lot of people do not seem to understand the implications of climate change. The majority of people do not deny that climate change is happening (well, at least outside of the United States), and most of them also understand that it’s humans causing it through emissions of greenhouse gases and land-use change. But they still don’t understand that they will probably die from it. Here are the most likely ways you could die because of climate change
  • troed@fedia.io
    35·
    7 days ago

    It’s your choice to hold opinions over scientific consensus.

    It’s known as climate science denial.

    • Gloomy@mander.xyz
      3·
      7 days ago

      What? You literaly poster an opinion peace. By a climate scientist, yes, but so is the response I posted.

      Plus, I quoted a study in reply to the comments about the IPCC.

      How is that climate science denial?

        • Gloomy@mander.xyz
          1·
          7 days ago

          And it is science denial to have a scientific opinion that is interpreting facts differently then the consensus?

          Also, from my first source:

          “The IPCC supports the overwhelming scientific consensus about human impact on climate change, so we would expect the reports’ vocabulary to be dominated by greater certainty on the state of climate science – but this is not the case.”

          The IPCC assigns a level of certainty to climate findings using five categories of confidence and ten categories of probability. The team found the categories of intermediate certainty predominated, with those of highest certainty barely reaching 8% of the climate findings evaluated.

          “The accumulation of uncertainty across all elements of the climate-change complexity means that the IPCC tends to be conservative,” says co-author Professor Corey Bradshaw, Matthew Flinders Fellow in Global Ecology at Flinders University. “The certainty is in reality much higher than even the IPCC implies, and the threats are much worse.”