This is a genuine question.

I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.

P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let’s be civil.

And if you’re a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.

  • Grandwolf319
    32·
    il y a 1 mois

    Yes but hopefully he will have some traumatic story that just gives him a light sentence.

    It’s still wrong, but when you agitate someone, the punishment for them punching you should be less.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      24·
      il y a 1 mois

      Sentancing requires him to be convicted…

      If he is convicted, we as society didn’t do our part here.

      No crime was committed so why would this chad get convicted

      • Grandwolf319
        31·
        il y a 1 mois

        I rather say murder is wrong but give a slap on the wrist for edge cases than to say murder is right in certain edge cases, regardless if it’s morally justified.