fossilesque@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 天前TikTok set to be banned in the US after losing appealwww.bbc.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square279fedilinkarrow-up1615arrow-down18
arrow-up1607arrow-down1external-linkTikTok set to be banned in the US after losing appealwww.bbc.co.ukfossilesque@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 天前message-square279fedilink
minus-squarePlastic_Ramses@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down6·5 天前Except for the extremely obvious disparity between chinese tiktok and american tiktok. Nothing at all.
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down20·5 天前So are you saying they run the algorithm in their country? On their internal mirror app? The exact same setup TikTok offered the US? I don’t see how that’s the evidence you’re looking for.
minus-squareAwesomeLowlanderlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·5 天前https://nypost.com/2023/02/25/china-is-hurting-us-kids-with-tiktok-but-protecting-its-own/ It’s extremely well documented that TikTok offers extremely different experiences within China than it does elsewhere.
minus-squareivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 天前I’m just a bystander, China sucks, but referencing a NY Post opinion piece feels a bit like using a Fox News segment as a source. They’re pretty trash.
minus-squareAwesomeLowlanderlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 天前There’s individual sources for practically every paragraph in that article, so I’m not seeing the issue in this case.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 天前OK, so lets say they moderated it the same way here as they did in China… All good now? I don’t think it matters at all how tiktok is actually being managed or moderated in the US - Americans simply do not trust anything Chinese. The cold war never ended.
minus-squareAwesomeLowlanderlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 天前By moderating, if you mean using the same algorithm for the content feed, it would make a significant difference to a lot of people I believe.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 天前Not a chance lol Most americans don’t know a single thing about China, but almost every one of them would tell you that it’s a anti-free speech hellscape. The only thing that matters is that it originated in China. Nothing else they do could change the opinion of the american public.
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tealinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 天前Of course it does, and for two major reasons: Chinese law is very different from American law China’s domestic propaganda interests are quite different than it’s international propaganda interests
Except for the extremely obvious disparity between chinese tiktok and american tiktok.
Nothing at all.
So are you saying they run the algorithm in their country? On their internal mirror app? The exact same setup TikTok offered the US?
I don’t see how that’s the evidence you’re looking for.
https://nypost.com/2023/02/25/china-is-hurting-us-kids-with-tiktok-but-protecting-its-own/
It’s extremely well documented that TikTok offers extremely different experiences within China than it does elsewhere.
I’m just a bystander, China sucks, but referencing a NY Post opinion piece feels a bit like using a Fox News segment as a source. They’re pretty trash.
There’s individual sources for practically every paragraph in that article, so I’m not seeing the issue in this case.
OK, so lets say they moderated it the same way here as they did in China… All good now?
I don’t think it matters at all how tiktok is actually being managed or moderated in the US - Americans simply do not trust anything Chinese.
The cold war never ended.
By moderating, if you mean using the same algorithm for the content feed, it would make a significant difference to a lot of people I believe.
Not a chance lol
Most americans don’t know a single thing about China, but almost every one of them would tell you that it’s a anti-free speech hellscape.
The only thing that matters is that it originated in China. Nothing else they do could change the opinion of the american public.
Of course it does, and for two major reasons: