You’re on the fediverse, the benefits of forcing the major players to federate with smaller platforms should be obvious. It would reduce the network effect advantage they have and allow users to move away without being trapped in the chicken and egg situation they currently are.
Wonder how Finns feel about this?
Not me who downvoted you, FYI.
To me, a vulnerability is something unforeseen, that allows bad actors to exploit the system in an unintended manner. In this case, the system is working perfectly as designed. Just because another system decided to implement a new feature without consulting anybody else, does not make it a vulnerability. Or perhaps it does, but with the vulnerability on the side of Mastodon, since they’re the ones telling their users their post is private when it is actually nothing of the sort.
What would I call it? An unsupported feature. One that Mastodon forced everybody else to implement without asking or any respect.
Great game! My buddy got the deluxe KS version, and the minis are really nice. The factions could use a bit more balancing though. Or we’re just bad at them.
That’s a new record for how long it took customer service to respond to a complaint.
Please submit your bid to purchase the property colloquially known as the US to the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.
Whoa. I’d have agreed with Blaze’s estimate myself. That’s a lot of accs. Maybe we can enlist them to hit 60k MAU?
Edit: She hit me up again 5 mins after I posted this. It’s a sign, guys. I think she’s the one.
I’m not sure you can make that conclusion. This isn’t a real vulnerability, and this isn’t a surprise to anybody who knows how the AP protocol works. Dansup didn’t reveal anything that was previously unknown, the blog author just has an axe to grind. It’s unfair to assume that an actual 0 day vulnerability would have been treated the same way.
more people will know and exploit the vulnerability
It’s not even a vulnerability, it’s how AP works by design, is the issue at hand here. Mastodon decided they wanted to implement something not supported by AP, and everybody else had to take the heat for not ‘doing it right’.
To keep it secure from the servers themself would require users to handle the encryption. See PGP for an idea of how much uptake that’s likely to get. If you mean for the servers to handle the encryption, that’s already the case, and the issue right now is that servers are privy to what users do, and by nature are a 3rd party in the convo.
Looks like there’s multiple with the same name, huh
Shh, this is the Internet, we don’t do nuance here.
What is the suggestion, then? Assuming a colony does ever get established, it’s impractical and naive to expect those who now live there to never demand land rights. The author makes good points but fails to discuss any potential solutions other than ‘stay earthbound’.
They arguably already have, given the beating OpenAI’s stock has taken in response.
Looking at the pricing page for feeder, apparently you’re limited to 200 feeds on the free tier?
It’s too friendly. Something’s not right.
Leave the grass alone, it’s got dead Marios under it.
Proof that zombies do exist
Why? I see it on my main feed all the time, it’s just osmosis.
Calvin fully deserves whatever is coming his way.
(Which doesn’t include corporal punishment, since Watterson was unusually enlightened for his time)