- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
If I’m reading this correctly, the headline is…very inaccurate.
It looks like a dispute between two developers in Organic Maps, who both started out at Maps.me, specifically over whether their CDN redirector should be public or private.
It’s one of the reasons I linked the hn discussion. Lots of accusations going around right now. It’s unfortunate as I like that app, but this kind of splitting is important to know about.
My experience with HN is comments from out-of-touch engineers and me-too startup folks circle jerking with themselves. Can’t say they’re any better than the random discourse on social media.
Yea, the comments there are just, wrong.
People claiming since the repo wasn’t public the MIT license didn’t matter. But since admins contributed under that license, it 100% matters.
No reason to wait for the dust to settle. Roman noticed a removal of an MIT license he contributed to, also noticed the inclusion of user logging, so he released MIT work he contributed to. He’s in the right.
It’s a shame.
So, what’s the point of Organic Maps or maps.me? The latter’s website just say “download and prepare for adventure”, like some sort of app for route preparation?
It’s a mobile map and navigation app which uses OpenStreetMap data
Where i live, Organic Maps has way better walking directions than Google and Apple Maps, and it’s a lot more respectful of privacy than at least the former.
Looks like the dispute is with one of the devs who didn’t work on maps.me.
Regardless, it’s probably best to wait until the dust settles to see what the facts are.
Sad, but also funny to see someone revoke an MIT license. Presumably they think that is retroactive as why do it otherwise. Instead of preventing use they just un-invite themselves from any group that wishes to continue it’s open source development.
Wow, that’s an incredible misunderstanding of copyright. Screw 'em.
Organic Maps rocks. Maybe I’ll go donate.
Edit: Read a bit of the discussion and it seems this is 100% Organic Maps, Maps.me is unrelated. I’ll hold off until the drama revolves.
Seems like some spicy drama. I’ll check back in a few days to see how it resolves. I love Organic Maps and I hope the core team resolves this appropriately.
I used maps.me for many years, it’s sad what happened. At least we have organic maps.
See also https://aussie.zone/post/15854596
https://lemmyverse.link/aussie.zone/post/15854596 to stay on your home instance.
Sometimes I wish lemmy/fediverse had an option to detect if something was on the fedi and give you the option to direct link. Would make it nicer to vote/follow.
Third-party apps like boost can do this, so I assume the frontend could if they wanted.
Interesting I’ll give it a shot.
Usually apps support the ! syntax.
Much like the other user, the instance link works for me and keeps me local, but the lemmy verse link takes me to that instance.
Did you select your home instance when accessing https://lemmyverse.link/ for the first time?
Yup. Or use custom, and type (for you) lemmy.ca
Worked for me just now. Super useful.
In Eternity, my link works and opens in the app while the
lemmyverse.link‘cannot be resolved’.Now THAT is a cool feditool!
I don’t understand how lemmy and fedi apps in general still have this problem, they never seem to be able to recognize a link and just show it on my home instance.
