• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    We talk a lot about left and right wing and what it means here. If you’re destroying elite power structures you are to the left of the king. There is zero ambiguity there.

      • SailorMoss
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I saw that video the other day. While I think that it’s true that there are social reasons why people adopt their politics. You’re extending that fact a bit far to say that fact nullifies left/right understandings of politics.

        That isn’t to say you shouldn’t have class solidarity with right-wingers. But it is a delicate situation because you also must maintain class solidarity with the groups right-wingers have been taught to hate.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        That’s pretty simplistic and puts the cart before the horse. Political coalitions are not a new phenomenon, nor are picking up your politics from your social connections. That was exactly how politics worked in Rome. Hell in Constantinople their coalitions straight up sponsored chariot racing teams and ended up burning the city down https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nika_riots . Your membership in a coalition was dependent on who you received patronage from.

        My point is, from the essence, from it’s meaning to the days of the third estate, breaking down power structures is left wing.