• Hubi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Honestly, I don’t blame them one bit. People need to keep in mind that these instances and sites are provided for free by private individuals and not large companies with armies of lawyers. I wouldn’t want to fight a potential lawsuit for “enabling piracy”, no matter how much bullshit it is. If the admins of dbzer0 have taken the necessary precautions, great! Just join their instance if that’s what you’re looking for.

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pretty sure all the piracy communities I’ve seen have rules about not directly linking to any infringing content. Mainly its piracy discussions.

      Here is a whole ass post from the admin of this instance about not directly linking: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/18438

      This post is linked under the main rules of this community, Rule 3. Don’t request of link to specific pirated titles.

      Meaning this is a joke of a line of reasoning, you’re not “protecting” anyone by limiting discussion.

      • laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but the piracy subreddit also had those rules and various companies still sent notices to reddit. Sure they were bullshit, but copyright law puts the burden of proof on the alleged infringers not the copyright holders.

        • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Someone here claimed they were in the Netherlands, turns out that’s not true they’re hosted in Finland.

          I didn’t know the USA’s DMCA applied to the country of Finland. Reddit still got them because they’re a fucking US company based in the fucking US.

          This shit is like people not understanding that The Pirate Bay didn’t have to follow US laws back in the day. Infuriatingly fucking dumb.

          • samus12345
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ruud, the main admin, is in the Netherlands, the server is in Finland.

          • laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you forgetting when the FBI still came after Pirate bay? And that the founders would have been arrested had they ever entered the US or any country with an extradition treaty?

      • Hubi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy.world is hosted in the Netherlands, which are notorious for going after people just for “promoting” piracy. They don’t care if you’re actually breaking the law, they will just make your life hard. And that’s not something I’d want to deal with in addition to hosting a free service.

          • Hubi@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re right, I must’ve gotten that mixed up. Still, Ruud is based in the Netherlands and I’m not sure how the hosting laws work across country borders. Strangely enough, the-federation.info lists lemmy.world as hosted in the United States…

          • darreninthenet
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Although he posted that he had to follow strict German anti piracy laws 🤷🏻‍♂️

            • samus12345
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because the company with the servers in Finland is German.

        • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Interesting that they wouldn’t say as much themselves in any of their writings about why they made this decision.

          EDIT: Turns out its not true. No Shit, Sherlock.

    • NightOwl@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, these are not company run sites with monetization plans. People saying they’ll show them by leaving is funny, since these instances cost money as opposed to making money so I don’t think they’ll be sad about less overhead. People here aren’t paying customers but guests being invited to use another person’s instance over self hosting their own.

      If people want uninterrupted access to this instance they can sign up to this instance, self host, or look for instances located in a country with less strict laws that might lower chances of defederation from here?

      • Freeman@lemmy.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Excatly why I never opened my instance. With it just being me, i can control what is on it and what is synced. There was too much risk with CP/CSAM type stuff. Heck I didnt even want to risk my linode account (aka they shut my other VPS systems down) due to TOS from shenanigans.

        That said, I can still contribute just fine with my own instance and dont have to be involved in these drama defederation actions.

        I would encourage anyone that is willing to criticize an instance maintainer for their decisions on risk to just roll out the lemmy-ansible setup and go your own way. If you troll or act in bad faith, you will get defederated. If you act like a reasonable person, no one will even notice. And that way you are in control of uptime, patch cadence, backups etc.

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Does self-hosting still have the problem of not being able to find communities since nobody on your instance had followed them?

          I was looking at self hosting for my normal browsing stuff, with all the porn and questionable stuff defederated or blocked (and keep this one exactly where it is on dbzer0) but I mostly just browse all, and I’ve heard that’s the same feed as subscribed on tiny instances.

          Any insight on that?

          • Freeman@lemmy.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have NSFW unchecked on my instance, so no porn is ingested/federated. Also because its just me, i have to seek out communities to federate with via search.

            I did this via https://lemmyverse.net/communities and changed the linked names to my domain and just ran searchs to start the federation for the specific communities i found interesting.

            It does mean things like “Local” is useless and subscribed and all are the same filters since its only stuff i subscribed to.

            Occasionally I will browse one of alts on a different instance and check all, or local there and see if theres anything interesting. I have also re-run through the link above here and there to find new communities to join. Those are probably the biggest “pain points” in that it takes more effort to find new communities. But once you start the feed its fine.

            I also use different default filters on my alt’s in different instances (ie: ALL:HOT on lemmy.world) or whatnot if im feeling like finding new stuff. But honestly the lemmyverse stuff gets like 99% of the content here, and theres been a dip in participation, so some communities are idling (which just means I dont see anything)

        • Setarkus.MX@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A few questions as you’re self hosting an instance and I haven’t read much about it yet.
          Are you hosting it on personal hardware?
          Can you just choose any free name for the domain if it’s on your own hardware or do you need to rent one regardless?
          Do you keep it active all the time or turn it off for the night/other periods of time where you know you won’t use it?

          • Freeman@lemmy.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you hosting it on personal hardware?

            Not currently, though I am considering it. Right now I host mine on a VPS in linode. Though i need to downgrade it, I built it with the expectationg of allowing joins, but recently decided just to keep it private.

            Can you just choose any free name for the domain if it’s on your own hardware or do you need to rent one regardless?

            This wouldnt work. You not only need to have a routable/real domain name, but the server likely needs access to the internet to allow fro federation, specifically ingress traffic, to work.

            Do you keep it active all the time or turn it off for the night/other periods of time where you know you won’t use it?

            Mine runs 24/7. Even if i hosted it at home it would be 24/7. Only issue is

            1. I already use port 80/443 at home. So i would need to reconfigure NGINX to use a proxy, which could also break federation. I could do that, in fact I am pretty sure the ansible config uses NGINX proxy commands, just that I would have to customize it and Im lazy. I already have stuff on VPS systems in linode (blog, teamspeak etc) so its no biggy to have another one.

            2. My internet at home can be flaky. For example I currently dont have power at home and while I normally run on UPS for a time, and can cut to generator when I am home, my network just went into auto-shutdown.

      • laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep. People were mad at Blahaj zone admins at defederating from the porn instances but holy shit the liability when it comes to these things is insane. People don’t seem to understand that an instance hosts a cache of all the federated instances that users visit. If something is hosted on one of the piracy instances that some corp doesn’t like, they come for everyone who has that data.

  • Alt+F4@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    To everyone ready with their pitchforks, here is a scenario: lemmy.world may receive a court order (subpoena?) mandating they disclose data on people actively accessing pirate communities. As it happened with Reddit, they may ask for logs and IP addresses of people commenting, posting or perhaps even up/down voting content.

    Even though none of the content is being posted/hosted with this instance, admins may be asked to betray user trust - or to go battle claimants in court. It’s a lose-lose for them, so maybe let’s cut them some slack, eh?

    • fidodo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, they’re a big target and being a big target means more liability. Spreading the fediverse is good for us all. It means taking down piracy is like whack a mole.

    • pastermil
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This needs to be said more. They did their best.

  • crowsby@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I see we’ve unfortunately brought over the trend of defaulting to assuming the worst intentions from Reddit, with a side portion of baseless accusations. While I’m disappointed that the community was removed, I think it can be easily explained by:

    • Speed Run the Content Moderation Learning Curve
    • The reality that, right or wrong, any significant legal action brought against them would be game over for the instance and personally devastating for the humans involved. Conde Nast they are not, and if Joe SIIA decides to put them in their crosshairs, the legal situation would be financially devastating.

    It’s reaaaaaally really easy to sit in the peanut gallery and talk shit about how they’re cowardly acquiescing when it’s not our neck in the noose.

    That being said, I feel like recent acts of defederation are only serving to highlight that the way forward in the fediverse is going to be having accounts on multiple instances in order to get the full breadth of offerings. In my case:

    • I initially signed up on lemmy.ml since that was, at the time the “main” instance.
    • Oh hey, kbin looks cool. I’ll sign up there and check it out.
    • Oh hey, people are saying that the lemmy.ml admins are evil commies or some shit. Welp I better make an account on lemmy.world in case anything goes sideways.
    • Oh hey, now I’m probably going to also need an account on dbzer0 as well, dope.
    • OverfedRaccoon 🦝@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’m not sure why some people assume it’s a problem. I’ve had a few accounts now. I went kbin to Beehaw (liked Lemmy more overall) to LemmyWorld to Lemmee (initially as an alt). Now Lemmee is the main. And if that goes sideways, well, I’ve got at least 3 other instances I’ve got my eye on as potentials. That’s the beauty of the Fediverse.

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It honestly makes a lot of sense to keep illegal content that’s the source of frequent legal actions away from the largest general purpose communities. As you correctly point out it is extremely easy to join another instance where these discussions are allowed, and the larger instances have every reason to have a “better safe than sorry” approach to content moderation.

      It seems to me the Threadiverse is too negative of the concept of defederation. It’s a key concept of how the Fediverse works, and is supposed to work. The people on Lemmygrad is looking for a completely different experience from the folks over at Beehaw, so let them have it. Lemmy.world has become the largest instance, so naturally they need to have an approach to content moderation that is unlikely to land them in legal trouble. And even if they didn’t, they’d be welcome to block discussions of piracy out of moral conviction or any other reason, just as their users are welcome to sign up somewhere else if they are looking for a different experience.

      There was drama about defederation on Mastodon in the beginning as well, but I guess people coming from Twitter had an easier time intuitively understanding the appeal of it.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem with your reasoning is that these communities aren’t providing/hosting any illegal content. Furthermore, “legal” where? US law doesn’t apply outside of the US and vice versa.

        • sab@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          My reasoning is fine. Discussion of illegal content, if we have to be completely pedantic. Which we don’t.

          The fediverse doesn’t need to be a unitary blob - in fact, it shouldn’t be a unitary blob. An instance could block any instance where the use of the letter “e” is allowed would be completely legitimate (though the number of federated instances would be limited).

          Though they have no moral obligations whatsoever to do so, it’s fair to expect Lemmy.world to have predictable rules and relatively stable policies as it is the most mainstream instance and has a bunch of users. And honestly, for the biggest, most mainstream instance, banning the discussion of piracy is pretty predictable. It’s simply not the kind of thing joining the largest platform of the Threadiverse is good for.

          If you don’t like it, this is why this place is federated in the first place. It’s literally like this by design. Just stop complaining and use some other instance instead, it costs you nothing.

          • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It isn’t pedantry as there aren’t discussions of illegal content occurring either. If I talk about torrents (not illegal) I’m not breaking the law or discussing anything illegal. Neither is a discussion about Qbittorrent or Jellyfin. Neither is a discussion about the hardware needed to seed 1000 different Linux ISOs. Don’t let your ignorance of the topic blind you.

            Can you point to the illegality of this post? https://beehaw.org/post/7156567

            Do you agree that [email protected] should also be defederated now for posting illegal content?

            Also, I am already using a different instance if that wasn’t obvious enough.

          • Gork@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hmm I shall possibly join that community to boycott this symbol, too.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nice to see some discussion about it besides “lemmy.world sucks!” Pirates should be used to having to make a bit of effort to help avoid the corpo Eye of Sauron. The bigger a community you are, the bigger a target.

    • bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The beauty of all of this is that I can just switch to an instance that doesn’t defederate or is very prone to not do so. So far kbin has been very good and doesn’t defederate much, which is awesome

    • darreninthenet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would be nice if there was a way or an app that ties together all those individual accounts into a single view.

  • Tiritibambix@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Absurd. None of these communities are even hosted on lemmy.world.

    lemmy.world has more downtime than France’s administration anyway,. so at least we can still sail the high seas while they’re down.

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absurd. None of these communities are even hosted on lemmy.world.

      This is the answer, period. They aren’t hosting infringing content, they’re barely even linking to discussion of it. Most of the piracy communities here on Lemmy all have rules about not directly linking to any infringing content.

      It’s a fucking joke by people who think they’re doing something to protect their users but are actually just fucking around wasting time and energy.

  • sovietknuckles [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Concern trolling about the legality of discussing piracy is just a distraction. Their goal is to serve ads on their site, and removing all references to piracy is a step towards that.

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      How can they even serve ads if you dont use their website? Wouldnt other websites and apps need to implement ads for it to work?

      • sovietknuckles [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        However Meta decides to serve ads on Threads or Threads content. Whatever it takes, Threads will definitely do ads, as they are owned by an advertising company, but we don’t really know how LemmyWorld will do ads until those ads are live.

        • RandomVideos@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Threads can only display ads on their app

          if lemmy.world adds ads, people can just not use the lemmy.world website

          As far as i know they cant force other apps to show ads

          • sovietknuckles [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Threads can only display ads on their app

            What is stopping them from adding ads to the website?

            if lemmy.world adds ads, people can just not use the lemmy.world website

            That’s what I imagine happening, a few people can’t stand it and leave or use uBlock, and the rest of the userbase gets served ads

            As far as i know they cant force other apps to show ads

            Not unless ads are a footer or something in post or comment content. That’s an intellectual property gray area, I wonder what will happen.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How do they expect to serve ads to people with that abysmal uptime that they have. They literally go down every single day, and that’s probably just from one person from hexbear who’s pissed at them, imagine how bad it’s going to be after this, or if they even started running ads.

      If they actually are planning on running ads I don’t foresee it going very well for them. Maybe it will maybe they’ll be financially successful but I bet they’re probably also going to get defederated and therefore not platform successful.

      • sovietknuckles [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        How do they expect to serve ads to people with that abysmal uptime that they have.

        The probably see it differently, that their uptime is limited by their funding, and additional revenue would help uptime.

        Maybe it will maybe they’ll be financially successful but I bet they’re probably also going to get defederated and therefore not platform successful.

        The current logic I’ve seen about why instances continue to federate with LemmyWorld is that they’re “too big to fail”, the same logic applied to Threads, and I don’t see ads changing that. If Threads uses a more PR-friendly way of running ads when they inevitably do, maybe LemmyWorld will copy whatever ad-serving method that is.

        […] and that’s probably just from one person from hexbear who’s pissed at them, […]

        You probably saw someone else say this, rather than making it up yourself, but Hexbear does not DOS anyone, please don’t repeat misinformation

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The probably see it differently, that their uptime is limited by their funding, and additional revenue would help uptime.

          They know that they are being DDoSed and have stated as much themselves, where are you getting this information, it sounds like you’re arguing that the downtime is because of massive user registrations and not from an attack like they said themselves, even the activity charts shown are indicative of an intentional attack, rather than user load, a single sharp spike in requests or activity preceding downtime instead of a large hump.

          The current logic I’ve seen about why instances continue to federate with LemmyWorld is that they’re “too big to fail”, the same logic applied to Threads, and I don’t see ads changing that. If Threads uses a more PR-friendly way of running ads when they inevitably do, maybe LemmyWorld will copy whatever ad-serving method that is.

          Uh threads has been defederated preemtively by several fairly large instances due to concerns regarding what Meta’s control over it and how it will affect federation. Lemmy.world hasn’t done anything to suggest they would be a significant privacy and security risk to users, at least not yet, pushing ads to federated servers or collecting and selling user data would absolutely change that I guarantee it.

          You probably saw someone else say this, rather than making it up yourself, but Hexbear does not DOS anyone, please don’t repeat misinformation

          I did indeed hear it from others, don’t worry you guys aren’t the only suspects in that, though you can’t really prove someone from as in registered to Hexbear isn’t behind them. I’m not saying they are or aren’t affiliated with Hexbear itself but one theory is that it’s a person from hexbear and you can’t prove that it isn’t unless you know who’s behind it. Honestly I heard from many admins (Lemmy.world and others) that Hexbear has a spam/trolling/brigading problem so it wouldn’t surprise me if a problematic user there was behind it, or at least collaborating in the effort.

          I didn’t and won’t go as far to accuse the instance owners themselves of being behind the attack but I won’t say it isn’t a user from Hexbear because nether you or I can prove that it isn’t.

          • sovietknuckles [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            […] it sounds like you’re arguing that the downtime is because of massive user registrations and not from an attack like they said themselves […]

            I have no idea where their downtime is from. If it is DOS-related, though, they would protect against it using a DDOS protection service like CloudFlare, which costs $$$

            Lemmy.world hasn’t done anything to suggest they would be a significant privacy and security risk to users, at least not yet

            They have, though. The LemmyWorld admins doxxed a user who they believed (incorrectly) to be Hexbear admin [email protected]. Source: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/1754850

            […], pushing ads to federated servers or collecting and selling user data would absolutely change that I guarantee it.

            We’ll see, but the larger they grow, the more permanent they get, and ads only affects that so much.

            I didn’t and won’t go as far to accuse the instance owners themselves of being behind the attack but I won’t say it isn’t a user from Hexbear because nether you or I can prove that it isn’t.

            Hexbear is not more suspect than other instances, and there is no reason to name-drop Hexbear, alone, in particular. If they’re being DOSed, then whoever is responsible is most likely involved in a community that has a culture of DOSing in general, like a Chan, maybe the same one that has actively been responsible for vandalizing Lemmy instances.

            • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I have no idea where their downtime is from. If it is DOS-related, though, they would protect against it using a DDOS protection service like CloudFlare, which costs $$$

              They currently do use Cloudflare actually, doesn’t magically stop all forms of DDoS though (ever heard of SQL queries, some of them can take seconds to execute). Anyway I only said that because a big misconception by people is that Lemmy.world’s uptime problem is caused by “the Reddit hug of death” as in user traffic and that it’s a scaling issue, when it isn’t.

              They have, though. The LemmyWorld admins doxxed a user who they believed (incorrectly) to be Hexbear admin [email protected]. Source: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/1754850

              That’s pretty bad, though honestly it still pales in comparison to Facebook’s awful history with collection and selling user data, though I guess how each instance views it. Maybe lemmy.ml (one of the biggest instances to ban threads) would use this to justify defederating from world (maybe I’ll let them know about it and see what they say, I know they’re certainly not going to go hunting for it on their own).

              We’ll see, but the larger they grow, the more permanent they get, and ads only affects that so much.

              I guess we’ll have to wait and see how it pans out

              Hexbear is not more suspect than other instances, and there is no reason to name-drop Hexbear, alone, in particular. If they’re being DOSed, then whoever is responsible is most likely involved in a community that has a culture of DOSing in general, like a Chan, maybe the same one that has actively been responsible for vandalizing Lemmy instances.

              I have indeed seen many things that do elevate Hexbear on the list as of the possible origins of an attack, but there isn’t any reason it couldn’t also be from one of the chans or any instance that was defederated from them.

              It does seem a bit weird to me though that you are strangely adamant about defending Hexbear, which does also make me slightly more suspicious, though that isn’t definitive, many people will defend their instances for totally innocuous reasons. Anyway we’re done with this, there was drama and concern (from several instances, not just world) and there’s no point in arguing about it when we can’t prove anything for certain here. Also this isn’t exactly the place for a debate, this is c/piracy not a debate forum.

  • glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I left Reddit because of bans, shadowbans, and powermods. A few weeks on Lemmy and we now have bans from powermods. This sucks.

      • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And then just go participate from the instance that got banned like nothing even happened

      • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Difference 2 is it’s not really powermodding. At least not from the way I personally understand powermodding. Imo powermodding is when a mod decides to get rid of content they personally just don’t like.

        In this case they got rid of a big risk to the instance itself, because, if someone decided to upload pirated content on here it would get federated to all instances that haven’t blocked the one initially distributing such content. Like another user said on this topic, this could be compared to torrenting, only without the direct P2P distribution. The risk of course falls on the people hosting the instances.

        Since they host these instances pretty much for free aside of donations, that are not a requirement, and the fact that, like nanometer said, you can just choose not to be part of the instance (and register to another instance), I wouldn’t put blame on the admins of lemmy.world in this case.

    • ARk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is that really the case though? They are saying they didn’t want to risk legal troubles which sounds reasonable to me considering they’re just your average people with a hobby.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dealing with DMCA takedown requests is a hassle, even if you never get charged with anything. I can understand them deciding not to bother with that. As long as they realize that in the process they’re not bothering with a certain portion of the userbase, who will move elsewhere to see the content they want to see. That’s easy on the Fediverse.

          • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This community and other Lemmy piracy communities generally all ban direct linking. If there are no direct links, what is there to DMCA takedown request for?

            Lemmy.world wants to put ads on their site. There isn’t a good, rational explanation for this because all of the piracy communities already have fucking rules in place for this. Check the sidebar here. Rule 3!

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nothing for legitimate DMCA takedowns to be sent about. That won’t stop DMCAs from being filed anyway, and those DMCAs will each need to be checked to see whether something slipped through the community’s rules.

              This basically means that even though the instance admins aren’t mods on the piracy community, they will still end up being on the hook for doing moderation work on that community. It’s understandable that some instance admins will say “nah, don’t want to do that.”

              If that bothers you, switch to a different instance.

            • laylawashere44@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can make a DMCA request for whatever you want. Even if it’s BS the onus of proof falls on the instance not the DMCA sender. Large social media platforms like YouTube and Reddit have agreements with large copyright holders to deal with their complaints out of court but there is no way any Lemmy instance has that.

              • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’re hosted in Finland. Is Finland required to follow US laws or respond to legal requests made under US laws? Pretty sure the answer is a resounding fucking NO.

    • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not every instance is good for every user or community. The Piracy communities have long been some of the biggest communities on here, however it’s absolutely within the rights of the world admins to decide they don’t want to support them? If you object, you don’t need to throw a fuss about it. Just move yourself or your communities to an instance that’s online with your viewpoints.

      • JBloodthorn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you object to people expressing their displeasure, you don’t need to throw a fuss about it.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you object to people objecting to people expressing their displeasure, you don’t need to throw a fuss about it.

      • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The crazy part about it is, that even if every instance blocked everyone, you could always host your own instance and I think if you host one just for yourself and maybe a few friends or something it probably wouldn’t even cost a cent.

    • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference is that now you have the option to go to another instance and still access the same content. It’s not ideal but much better than yhe community being permanently gone.

    • Diminish4036@noworriesto.day
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just use an instance that isn’t lemmy.world. that’s the benefit of decentralization.

      Besides, that server feels way too much like reddit, and not in a good way.

  • Archlinuxforever@lemmy.3cm.us
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I host my own private instance. It allows me to subscribe to any community I want without having to deal with anyone’s crap.

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A fucking shitty homophobic/transphobic troll at that. Great job, lemmy.world, you fucking geniuses. /s

  • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Seems more than reasonable. In every case like this, I try to ask if I was in their shoes and I had that level of responsibility, what would I do?

    I think anyone minded to check our piracy content knows where to find it and can register to one of those instances. This allows lemmy.world to remain a general purpose open instance for people migrating who don’t yet know what they are after.

    This could actually be an incentive for people to move away from world and that gives a little more space for people to move across and dip their toes in the lemmy ocean.

  • 雨 月@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That´s one thing I GENUINELY can´t wrap my head around with lemmy in general. How is it, that the admins of one lemmy instance feel responsible for what gets posted in a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT instance to the point they feel the need to keep their own members from even seeing it? It doesn´t reflect negatively on firefox, that they allow me to access piracy sites. It doesn´t reflect negatively on gmail that they allow me to use their email address to subscribe to piracy stuff. Why would it reflect negatively on lemmy.world, if their members also accessed piracy stuff? Are the admins of lemmy.world somehow responsible for what their members do, even if it´s not on their own instance?

    • llii@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the content their users subscribe to gets copied to the lemmy.world servers. At this moment they host these posts.

    • AAA@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are the admins of lemmy.world somehow responsible for what their members do, even if it´s not on their own instance?

      They are not responsible for what their users do, but for what is saved on their instance. And by any lemmy.world user interacting with content from a different instance, their lemmy.world will host a copy of that content. That’s how lemmy works.

      So if a lemmy.world user subscribes to a pirate sub, that whole subs content is now mirrored on lemmy.world.

      Not just related to piracy that’s a huge liability issue for admins.

      • 雨 月@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh boy, I didn´t know that. What´s the reason of doing it that way though? I mean, since I discovered lemmy, most if not all drama related to lemmy being a good platform came down to the fact that certain instances blocked certain other instances OR even to the question why an instance DIDN´T block another instace that had some right wing shit on it. Seems to me, having your instance simply copy over everything might be more of a liability at this point.

        • AAA@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well I don’t know why it’s being done like this, but my informed guess would be:

          Resilience. If the content wouldn’t be copied, defederating/blocking an instance would mean that the content you created there (topics, comments, etc) would be lost to you. So if you wrote a nice comment, or saved a bunch of topics for later, and then your instance blocks the other instance… that would be gone for you. With the copy this doesn’t happen.

          Performance. Instead of having to deal with every user (from a different instance) individually, your instance only has to deal with other instances. With this updates between each other can be sent in larger chunks (and definitely with less network connections). Additional benefit: smaller instances don’t get knocked down by user-heavy instances when they host a popular community.

          Just guesses tho.

          All social media is a liability time bomb unfortunately. That’s why only the biggest players can afford it so far.

      • SchizoDenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But piracy instances aren’t hosting the pirated content either. It’s hosted on seperate servers and it is only linked AFAIK.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I think the reasoning is stupid in this particular case. But there are good reasons to defederate from instances due to the content they allow in some cases.

    • Quacksalber
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What is it they should ask?
      “Should we stay federated with a community that has the very real potential of producing content that is illegal for us to share and in turn risk getting sued?
      [ ] Risk your livelihood so we can continue accessing the content
      [ ] Be lame and preemtively defederate”

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    One of the L.W admins has said that it could be a temporary measure and they are just seeking advice about their legal exposure. They’re also going to speak to one of the admins over here. So it might just resolve itself.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I already made an account here, I honestly can’t count on lemmy.world to not defederate or block random communities. Even if they take back that decision I still don’t have as much trust in them as I once did.

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The nature of federation and defederation makes it sensible to have a few accounts, to get around defederating and as general backup in case your home instance goes down. I imagine some apps will allow you to combine feeds from different accounts and this issue will be smoothed over.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the liftoff app already has a feature like this, it’s been a bit buggy for me though, but that might just be because of lemmy.world’s uptime issues due to the ongoing attacks and maybe it would work better if I didn’t have a login for lemmy.world on the app.

  • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just hate that I now need an account for every stupid instance there is, including keeping an eye open in which community is suddenly blocked. Tedious but at least them blocking is useless.

    • samus12345
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not useless - they’re not trying to keep you from coming here, they’re trying to avoid liability for themselves.