I’m not going to believe something without evidence. your hand waiving is not evidence, and historical data about irrational actors is not predictive about the future of those same markets. it can’t be reliable evidence about the future in a separate market.
others already do that. no need for me to undertaking such an endeavor. the problem is that we don’t have a method to reduce demand. you haven’t even produced a method to measure demand.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I’m not going to believe something without evidence. your hand waiving is not evidence, and historical data about irrational actors is not predictive about the future of those same markets. it can’t be reliable evidence about the future in a separate market.
Removed by mod
calling me names won’t change the truth.
The truth is whatever you believe regardless of evidence, clearly.
Removed by mod
such an experiment would have no bearing on a separate product in a separate market.
Produce milk then, I’ll wait.
others already do that. no need for me to undertaking such an endeavor. the problem is that we don’t have a method to reduce demand. you haven’t even produced a method to measure demand.
You have changed the argument from: demand decreasing does not reduce supply. To: we can’t reduce demand. Do you see the flaws in your argument yet?
I’m not constructing an argument
I’m deconstructing one.
you haven’t provided a method to test your hypothesis.
demand decreasing doesn’t cause a reduced supply.