• givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Fresh off hip replacement surgery, Nancy Pelosi, 84, secured another victory. House Democrats on Tuesday afternoon decided that 74-year-old Gerry Connolly—who announced his throat cancer diagnosis in November—will serve as ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, besting 35-year-old Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in a closed-door caucus vote. “Gerry’s a young 74, cancer notwithstanding,” said Virginia Democrat Don Beyer, a Connolly ally. Pelosi had opposed the 35-year-old’s run for the role, “approaching colleagues urging them to back Connolly over Ocasio-Cortez,” Axios reported last week.

    Don Beyer is also 74, which is why he won’t say 74 is too old.

    These people won’t step down, as painful as it may be we need to primary them completely out of office if we want a chance against fascism.

    • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Vote only for candidates who promise to fight for maximum age limits for all Congressional, executive and judicial positions. End the gerontocracy.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The party can legally just ignore primary votes and name anyone for any spot in the general.

        If push comes to shove, I really can’t say for sure that they’ll all hand the keys over if it’s a wave. I think there’s a decent chance the close ranks, and if any state party doesn’t, the DNC cuts them off. Like, for the last decade they been standing on a pile of dynamite threatening to drop it if we don’t do what they say.

        Especially with age related cognitive decline, I think they’ll drop the match honestly believe they’re doing what’s best.

        Which is exactly why they need to go.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The party can legally just ignore primary votes and name anyone for any spot in the general.

          In the same way that the US government can just ignore its own Constitution without violating any international laws.

        • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          They can’t legally ignore primary votes. It’s not necessarily a crime, but there is definitely a successful and very expensive lawsuit if someone wins a primary by the rules and the party just picks someone else instead.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            lawsuit

            The DNC literally have argued in court to a judge that they can do this and the judge agreed…

            It wasn’t even a decade ago, you’re almost definitely old enough to have lived thru it. And it was pretty big news at the time…

            The DNC argued the only-in-politics defense that the Sanders donors knew that the committee was biased toward Clinton, and therefore, it was under no legal obligation to be neutral or fair to all candidates.

            https://lawandcrime.com/opinion/bernie-sanders-donors-lose-case-alleging-dnc-improperly-tipped-the-scales-in-favor-of-hillary-clinton/

            The DNC legitimately said Dem voters should know that the DNC is corrupt and that they won’t let a fair primary happen.

            You’re talking like this is a hypothetical still, the lawsuit has already happened.

            But like, even just a few months ago we saw it happen:

            “Moreover, political parties have the constitutional right to determine the procedure by which they select their nominees, as repeatedly confirmed by the Supreme Court,” Foley said, citing the Supreme Court cases Democratic Party of United States v. Wisconsin ex rel. La Follette and California Democratic Party v. Jones.

            “The authority of the national parties to choose their nominee in the event the nominee can’t run comes as a surprise to many in this day of wall-to-wall primaries,” Elaine Kamarck, author of “Primary Politics: Everything You Need to Know about How America Nominates Its Presidential Candidates,” wrote in September. “And yet, it is a reminder that the choice of a nominee is party business — not state law, not federal law, and not constitutional law."

            https://www.factcheck.org/2024/07/experts-delegates-free-to-pick-democratic-nominee/

            People need to start paying more attention