• Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I second this. Blinking lights make it more difficult to gauge your position, speeds,or even Tell if you’re stationary or moving.

    Also at an intersection if I look your way in the split second your light blinks, you’re invisible.

    Whem i cycle i always use solid lights, and only if i have more than one rear light I’ll make it blink.

    Think, if blinking lights are safer, why aren’t they installed factory default on cars and airplanes? They are in fact less safe.

    • Techranger@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Counterpoint: blinking lights are in fact installed on airplanes both large and small. Red beacon lights blink, and so do high intensity white strobe lights. The variation helps identify the source of lights against a busy city skyline at night (that must be an aircraft we’re looking at) and serves to call attention against a sea of steady lights in the background. It’s very easy for the airplane to blend in otherwise. Even some racecars pulse their brakelights automatically to draw the attention of fellow racers. Finally, as a driver in sometimes poorly lit areas compounded with a rather avid local bicycling culture, I have found that bicycles equipped with rear-facing red blinking LEDs really help distinguish the bike against the background. The best setups had a light on the back of their helmets as well, which does the most to aid depth perception.

      • halfapage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Planes typically do not overtake each other at night on a width limited road.

        Blinking indeed helps identifying object as a bicycle, that is undeniable.

        Blinking also makes it significantly more difficult to assess bicycle’s exact speed and position at poor visibility conditions, especially while overtaking it, when not supported by another, constant light source indicator.

        I do not understand why having an additional, always on light is such a controversial thing to do for many people. If it’s all about safety, then having it is in worst case scenario an extra protection.

        • Techranger@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’d agree: more lighting is better, and an easily recognisable arrangement of constant lights would help with depth perception. The farther apart from each other, the better. Defending the use of blinking lights as a very important addition is my aim here.

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      For me:

      Solid light in the dark + a second flashing toplight on the helmet if possible.

      Drying the day, both sets flashing.

      A flashing toplight has definitely saved me before as it’s flashing where your are looking so people pulling out of side roads see you, has definitely made a few drivers jump!

      In the dark you need that fixed light for judging distance etc as you said.