Cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/34117495

[OC]

Original still created by @gedogfx (IG). Title source: “Inkl”

Edit: I’m not on any other social media platforms, so feel free to share this elsewhere if you want

  • iAmTheTot
    12·
    1 day ago

    Well, I disagree. They may be trained on different data sets but both represent the same ethical problems with generative AI right now, imho.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      20 hours ago

      Clearly you don’t even know what AI means and just parrot whatever meme you hear. What ethical issues? You’re comparing copyright theft to what? Using machine learning to decide whether insurance claim should be accepted? These aren’t even the same realm of computing and as close as a calculator is to Candy Crush.

      • iAmTheTot
        1·
        17 hours ago

        So, you don’t think there’s ethical issues with letting machine learning who lives and dies? When did I say they were the exact same technology? Do not assume what I do and do not know based on things I did not say, my friend.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          15 hours ago

          Nah dude you said it’s the same ethical issue when it’s clearly not. Machine deciding whether who lives or dies vs what exactly? What’s the other issue that is the same “ethical issue” here with image generating AI? Which part is the same or even remotely similar?

          Maybe you mean that both technologies are problematic? But that’s really not all that useful because ALL technology is problematic by the very nature of it being a force of change.

          • iAmTheTot
            11·
            9 hours ago

            No, please read my comment carefully. I said they represent the same ethical problems. You should not use quotes when you are not, you know, actually quoting me.

            I am maybe not the best with words but I did not mean to imply they are the exact same issue. Please stop replying to me about this topic now.