• jo3shmoo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Practicing prosthetist for about 15 years now. The fights we have with insurance for coverage get worse every year while copays and deductibles continue to increase.

    At least in the case of the hand in the article they likely hit denials on a multi articulating hand, claiming it’s not necessary over a simple open-close hand. I fight that fight every day and it’s absolutely BS to limit access to these types of hands or myoelectric devices in general just because they’re more expensive than an old school body powered hook.

    Ask anyone in healthcare and they’ll tell you something has to change. The system does not work for the majority of working people.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I guess some Health Insurance CEO needs their leg shot off, see how a prosthetic limb can become a necessity.

    (for legal and moderation reasons: this isn’t a joke)

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not even one month. That’s how long it took for them to resume screwing over their insurees.

  • fan0m@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The article makes it sound like the insurance will no longer approve a higher end prosthetic rather than something that is not as feature-rich.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      it’s a limb replacement, the only ones everyone should wear is the fanciest ones unless they specifically request a simpler one.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s not what it said. If you read through the entire article, you find statistics about how many people can’t get prosthetics at all because they aren’t considered necessary or they can’t afford the co-payment or they have to take out a loan.

      But even if what you said were the focus, that would be equally messed up. The article opens with the story of a man who got his artificial leg replaced for many years and only recently did they try to reject the hardware that he needs, the hardware that his doctor prescribes… What kind of screwy bait and switch shit would that be? Your insurance company should not be deciding how you live.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        can’t afford the co-payment

        Use fees are cruel barriers to proper healthcare. We see it even in some parts of Canada (healthcare in Canada isn’t uniform, region-to-region, as it was relegated to provinces to define so the cruel conservatives couldn’t unilaterally kill it, and so they just gut their own region’s support to the bare letter of the law and thus implement user fees and premiums).