BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldM to InsanePeopleFacebook@lemmy.world · 3 days agoSovcit doesn't understand.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1290arrow-down15
arrow-up1285arrow-down1imageSovcit doesn't understand.lemmy.worldBonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldM to InsanePeopleFacebook@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squarestate_electrician@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day ago“So next time someone’s teaching why don’t you get taught.” implies that getting taught requires someone teaching, but does not automatically follow said teaching.
minus-squareemeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·22 hours agoNo but it does imply that getting taught requires learning, which is what the OP actually says instead of teaching.
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up42·3 days agoNo. One of my favorite insults is: “Just because you didn’t learn, doesn’t mean they didn’t teach.”
minus-squaresome_guy@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoNot when you only have two brain cells orbiting within an empty head.
minus-squareNougat@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up8·3 days agoOrbiting implies gravity. Gravity implies mass.
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinecakelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 days agoThey aren’t mutually inclusive.
Does teaching imply learning?
“So next time someone’s teaching why don’t you get taught.” implies that getting taught requires someone teaching, but does not automatically follow said teaching.
No but it does imply that getting taught requires learning, which is what the OP actually says instead of teaching.
No. One of my favorite insults is:
“Just because you didn’t learn, doesn’t mean they didn’t teach.”
Not when you only have two brain cells orbiting within an empty head.
Fighting for second place.
Orbiting implies gravity. Gravity implies mass.
Checks out, they’re extremely dense
They aren’t mutually inclusive.