nanoUFOM to GamesEnglish · 5 days agoWe learned just how small Valve really is this year, but also how good it is at raking in the cash: It's making more money per employee than Applewww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square235fedilinkarrow-up1509arrow-down18
arrow-up1501arrow-down1external-linkWe learned just how small Valve really is this year, but also how good it is at raking in the cash: It's making more money per employee than Applewww.pcgamer.comnanoUFOM to GamesEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square235fedilink
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tealinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·3 days agoExactly. The main problems are two-fold: chance-based item acquisition - if I can buy the thing I want, that’s fine, but if it’s all chance based, it promotes gambling market to resell items - now there’s a cash incentive to gamble I don’t have a problem with paid cosmetics, I have a problem with promoting gambling. That said, I think Valve has done more good than bad, so I like them. I don’t like everything they do though.
Exactly. The main problems are two-fold:
I don’t have a problem with paid cosmetics, I have a problem with promoting gambling.
That said, I think Valve has done more good than bad, so I like them. I don’t like everything they do though.