It is extremely possible to explain the evidence for and against an issue, if not for the phony standard of “balance” which doesn’t exist in science. Scientists don’t feel the need to “balance” overwhelming evidence against phony baloney. It’s a completely reasonable expectation from anybody who’s not in the propaganda business.
![Balanced news reporting [@twisteddoodles]](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/beaa8a80-02fa-4127-8997-8e47246b369b.jpeg){kind=link}
It is extremely possible to explain the evidence for and against an issue, if not for the phony standard of “balance” which doesn’t exist in science. Scientists don’t feel the need to “balance” overwhelming evidence against phony baloney. It’s a completely reasonable expectation from anybody who’s not in the propaganda business.