Context: https://lemmy.world/comment/14224519

I was just browsing some comments and came across this… exchange. In addition to “WTF is wrong with you” I also reported the comment for something like, ‘this person is using the plain definition of genocide to discredit the idea of genocide. this person is clearly some kind of bigot/troll, or a deeply ignorant and unserious person. please keep a close eye on this person.’ I think that’s the reason why another mod responded with the genocide articles. All this before I realized they were a mod. Incidentally, this flyingsquid character is still sealioning that nobody answered them and that “the genocide is, as I said, not all that horrific.” At least they put the words in their own mouth this time (downgraded from “you must not think it’s all that horrific” -what the fuck!?).

When I checked my inbox this morning I found they had responded, but this time I noticed their name, and the M next to it.

So I ask you, in this context (or any, really), is “…good god, you’re a mod here?” uncivil? I think the moderator is silencing legitimate criticism. I think it was the moderator being uncivil throughout. I think this flyingsquid character is a Power Tripping Bastard.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It’s not a “bad look”, it’s abuse. Moderators are supposed to be impartial, that’s the whole point, whether at a political debate, or in an online forum. Censoring one side to support their beliefs would get them fired from any other moderator job on the planet. The only reason they get away with it here is because they do it for free and keep the conversations relatively spam/bot-free.