Sky Australia dont even try to hide that they are pushing the murdock agenda
She argues as honestly as any tankie.
This really is a master class in how to handle hostile news media
Plus the perfect example for how the MSM, especially right-wing Murdoch rags, are nothing but psychological warfare to manufacture consent for the plutocracy.
The big lie she tried to repeat is that NEW fossil plants are cheaper than renewables. In 2019, in US, new FF peaker (cheapest) plants cost over $1/watt, while solar was under $1/watt. FF plants have operating and fuel costs. Solar panels have since dropped 20c/watt since then.
The Australian market has the most developed home solar costs/penetration in the world. It is successful because utility, largely legacy, power is expensive/extortionist. AUS wholesale electricity market averages between 11c to 20c per kwh.
$1/w solar provides a 3% yield/year at under 2c/kwh in AUS for 30 years, which has very high solar production capacity. LFP batteries, now down to 10c/watt also has a 30 year lifespan at 4 hours storage, and is 3% yield at 1c/kwh discharge - charge margin.
6% interest rates means 6c/kwh from solar and 3c/kwh from batteries pays for project with full leverage. Free money at just 10c/kwh revenue. Winfalls at higher revenue rates. Actual solar costs are below $1/watt and interest rates below 6%, and what needs to improve.
As for jobs, new energy is jobs. Adding x gw of solar per year is permanent jobs even if there is little operating staff. Growing x each year is permanent job increases every year.
Australia is amazing for solar. I wish Canada would step up and fix our damn regulations. It’s insanely more expensive to install household rooftop solar here vs Australia. I’m so jealous!
Cost is entirely based on monopoly utility power, and their power to refuse connection. Australia does have a good 40%+ solar production advantage over Canada though, but Canada does have “net pricing” which banks long summer surpluses for winter.
They do not care about facts. The suffering is the point.
It’s either sadism or greed with the right. Flip a coin.
It’s probably more greed in this context though.
News hosts should ask critical questions. It’s not their job to try and “win” a debate. She could have said “thank you for your insight” and be done.
Ideally, they should ask critical questions. But this host’s job (that is, the labor they are being paid to perform) isn’t to serve society as a news host. It’s to disseminate corporate propaganda on behalf of the network major shareholders. It was their job to try and “win” that argument (it’s not even a debate!) and they sure didn’t.
It is their job to protect big oil tho lol.
Big coal*
I love that she was so willing to repeatedly interrupt him and say shit that made her look insane and/or unqualified to have an intelligent conversation.
He got his message accross. Despite attempts to hinder it. Nice.
Sky News is Murdoch rag trying to be Fox.
Fox
The other Murdoch rag.
She was so much more civil than any host I’ve ever seen on Fox News or talk radio in the US though. I appreciate they didn’t pick someone less articulate to interview as well.
There was so much respect and dignity here I don’t know what to say. I’m not used to this. They play Fox News in the bars here
Jesus Christ American media is in bad shape that you think this is journalistic integrity.
You are picking a fight with the wrong people
My word she is a patronising arsehole
So unprofessional.
