When I see “the FDA has stated…” I automatically think it is probably a corrupt conclusion bought by some powerplayer to maximize their own profit instead of having to do with whether the statement is true or not. I’ve always viewed FDA as basically a council of a bunch of power players on boards of Big Capitalism companies like Pepsi that make decisions based on control and market share rather than health.

but I see posts now about how trump attacking FDA equals bad. So is my view of FDA wrong? Are they noncorrupt? Are they a necessary evil? Should they be thrown in a volcano and remade?

  • ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t think the question is to be taken that literally.

    Thats how writing works.

    However, you can still have an opinion about the overall organisation regardless of the nuance.

    It’d be meritable if that person were six to eight years old.

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Oy, I’m the autistic one here. Why am I explaining to you not to take things too literally :p

      • ✧✨🌿Allo🌿✨✧OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        you’re the one who would raise a smart child :)

        the people you are speaking against would have children that stop asking questions after the first few times they are hurt by doing so.

        good job being a good person :)