Babybonita@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoWho can relate?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1535arrow-down118
arrow-up1517arrow-down1imageWho can relate?lemmy.worldBabybonita@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareGodric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up27·1 month agoSome other interesting Lent exceptions include gator, beaver, and muskrat, being considered “fish” theologically speaking.
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 month agoGlad I don’t have to give up eating beaver for Lent
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 month agoThere’s a case to be made for them all being fish biologically speaking, too. Of course, that case would also mean making chicken, beef, and all the other meat people typically eat would be fish, which might defeat the intent of the rule.
minus-squarevoodooattack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoAnd good luck if you’re allergic to fish
minus-squarerhombuslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI’m glad I’m not the only one who immediately hears that every time the word beaver pops up.
Some other interesting Lent exceptions include gator, beaver, and muskrat, being considered “fish” theologically speaking.
Glad I don’t have to give up eating beaver for Lent
There’s a case to be made for them all being fish biologically speaking, too.
Of course, that case would also mean making chicken, beef, and all the other meat people typically eat would be fish, which might defeat the intent of the rule.
And good luck if you’re allergic to fish
Removed by mod
I’m glad I’m not the only one who immediately hears that every time the word beaver pops up.