• lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I agree that there’s a lot of space between “considered disabled” and “horrible life”, but OP said “suffer their whole life” which I associated with the latter.

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And what is suffering?

      Some people consider Down-Syndrome a horrible condition. Yet, people suffering from it can lead happy and fulfilling lives. It is a slippery slope that, if not navigated carefully, has historically leaded to atrocities.

      • lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yet, people suffering from it can lead happy and fulfilling lives.

        Sure, it’s possible for a person with a severe disability to grow up happy. But when one is making a decision in real life (like having a child), one should consider an average case, not a exceptional one. And the average case for an example like Down’s Syndrome is pretty bad. It is a bit unclear how to quantify the suffering in this particular disease’s case because the main harm to the child is lifelong mental impairment and assorted physical disabilities - but it is at least going to inflict suffering on the child’s family, since caring for a child with a severe disability for their entire life isn’t exactly fun.

        It is a slippery slope that, if not navigated carefully, has historically leaded to atrocities.

        I don’t see the relation. You’ll notice that I’m not proposing killing off disabled people for the “improvement of society” or whatever it was that nazis called it. I am not doing this because nonconsensually killing a person is a harm to them. But deciding not to have a child isn’t the same thing as murdering a person - it’s not harming anyone who exists, and hence may well be morally better than having a child.

        (Oh, I suppose you might mean that I’m arguing that there are circumstances in which it’s morally bad for a person to have a child, which is similar to nazi eugenics in that I’m deciding whether or not people should have children? In that case, my answer is that the difference is that I’m a person, not an authoritarian government, and I don’t have power (nor, indeed, the desire) to force people to obey my personal moral judgements.)

        • foenkyfjutschah@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          And the average case for an example like Down’s Syndrome is pretty bad.

          with my experience as care-taker i cannot agree. is there scientific knowledge that you can cite that’d explain me how divergent my experiences are from the averaged realities.