Perhaps the most interesting part of the article:

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, it sounds like he is responsible probably for the Kenneth fire, which started after the winds had died down a bit. Still enough wind to kick it off (regular 20 mph gusts), but it wasn’t hurricane force winds like Tuesday when the Palisades and Eaton fires started. I’m skeptical that any arsonist is fire happy enough to also get clonked in the head by flying debris.

    • pelespirit
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can see why you’re pretty confident, but I don’t think you can be 100% confident that these weren’t all started. We’ll have to wait and see. They’re usually pretty great about figuring out what happened.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s honestly really impressive. The majority of the evidence has been incinerated by thousand-degree fires and covered in sea water and firefighting foam by the time investigators get to it.

        • pelespirit
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not if their cameras were sent to the cloud before they were engulfed in flames.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I was thinking physical evidence, like accelerants, etc. If they did it in view of cameras, that’s obviously much easier to catch, lol.