Guys, at this rate I don’t think the revolution’s going to happen anytime soon.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Someone somewhere would because UBI is the capitalist techbro idea of a social safety net; it’s a band-aid that doesn’t address the underlying problems in a similar way to how the ACA helps but in reality is a very center-right idea that doesn’t address the underlying hypercapitalist healthcare system.

    • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Well there yah go, we didn’t even need to introduce it and it’s already not left enough.

      • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        It was cooked up by Milton Friedman, one of the grandfathers of American free market libertarianism.

        The whole impetus of UBI was to eliminate traditional social services because, it is argued, there’s no way that a government institution could be as efficient or effective as a free market.

        And make no mistake, even modern proponents of UBI such as Andrew Yang propose funding it by hollowing out existing social services.

        Like, yeah, UBI is better than having literally no social support at all, but the fact that its seen as this ultra-leftist idea, to the point that we apparently can’t even conceive of how it could possibly “not be left enough”, is an indication of how far right mainstream politics has shifted.