• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Dude is just arguing semantics, that “propaganda” necessarily has to be a misleading message in favor of its sender.

    Of course, tailoring of information by omission is also propaganda.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My point is that propaganda is not necessarily evil. I dislike propaganda from the CCP as much as the next non-tankie. But claiming “this platform is spreading propaganda, therefore evil” is ignorant as best and condoning the other imperialist propaganda at worst.

      Know it’s from China and don’t believe anything Tiktok says on the CCP. Done.

      I happen to like the Palestine propaganda on Tiktok and dislike the imperial core censoring dissidents, that’s all.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        My point is that propaganda is not necessarily evil. I dislike propaganda from the CCP as much as the next non-tankie. But claiming “this platform is spreading propaganda, therefore evil” is ignorant as best and condoning the other imperialist propaganda at worst.

        What kind of propaganda is the CGP pushing, exactly? Is it with us in the room, right now?

        Umm, that’s not really propaganda, homie. That’s simple censorship. There’s a difference.

        Again: how is this pro-CCP propaganda? Do you understand the difference between censorship and propaganda?

        Sounds a lot more like ‘denying propaganda is being pushed’

        Propaganda can be for good or bad. But acknowledging that it is propaganda is a necessary first step in either case for any citizen worth the name, whether a citizen of a nation or the world.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 hours ago
            spoiler

            “Propaganda from the CCP is not a good thing”

            “It’s not propaganda.”

            “It literally is.”

            “It’s not.”

            “It literally is, and here are the receipts.”

            “It’s not.”

            “This is the line in the receipt where it clearly states it is.”

            “Well, my point is that propaganda is not necessarily evil.”

            “Good or evil, it’s a prerequisite for anyone with pretensions to politics beyond a tribal or gut instinct to recognize that something is propaganda.”

            “You’re missing my point.”

            Please. Show me where this summary is wrong. Show me the point I missed.

              • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                This comment summarized my point.

                The comment I quoted and responded to, yes.

                What is the point I supposedly missed?

                  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    But this entire conversation sprouted from you explicitly denying propaganda being pushed. Saying “My point isn’t that it’s not propaganda” when every previous comment was about you denying it’s propaganda rings very hollow.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          No, it’s the other way around: Propaganda is trying to influence one’s political beliefs. Most news is propaganda, political memes are propaganda, “go vote!” signs are propaganda, uncle Sam is from propaganda, etc.

          I’m talking about the neutral definition. From Wikipedia:

          Beginning in the twentieth century, the English term propaganda became associated with a manipulative approach, but historically, propaganda had been a neutral descriptive term of any material that promotes certain opinions or ideologies “Ideology”.