• Barbarian
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Isn’t this kinda already the case when you compare California to other states? In terms of subsidizing the rest of the country, not healthcare.

    • shawn1122@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wonder if Canada sending its water bombers so that California doesn’t get burnt to a crisp counts as a transfer payment.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Canada has a massive program of equalization transfer payments where taxes collected in rich provinces go to subsidize poor ones. The US does not have anything like this. None of the state governments have their budgets subsidized by other states.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s federal taxes so it’s the federal government that’s subsidizing some provinces and not others to make their potential tax revenue per capita the same, the goal is to make sure those provinces aren’t left behind.

        If the program didn’t exist Albertans would still pay those taxes, they would be used to pay for other Canada wide programs.

        Bonus: Lil’PP signed on the the current calculation of transfer payments, it was put in place during the Harper years.