• Will Johnathan
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      um aktualy 🤓 the original problem was purely for philosophical purposes but not entertainmenatal purposes

  • CaptThax
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I think you would HAVE to pull it right? Regardless of how many times the lever can be given to the next person, you are either killing 1/3rd lives in the scenario, or you are killing 1/8bil.

      • Will Johnathan
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Assuming the problem is infinite and considers physical factors, then it would happen at one point

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Actually, if it doubles every time and we assume 8 billion is the max, you only need 32 people to not pull it. Maybe I’d bet on that. If I was in the middle I’d let it pass no question.

  • maximus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Eventually somebody’s going to pull the lever, either accidentally or deliberately, so it’s best to flip it while it kills the least amount of people.
    I guess b/c of that it’s sort of like the regular trolley problem.

  • Wintar
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    I guess it depends how far down it goes. Infinitely? Only enough for every person on the planet to be considered?
    Theoretically, the correct option is to always switch down. Which, according to the original problem, would be doing nothing. So… what if everyone just went home?
    Also to consider; The people (and track) gets smaller every time. Maybe it ends?

    • Captain Minnette
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Eventually it could come to a Joker guy who wants to kill as many people as possible, and you’ve given them the opportunity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yep. There’s so, so few of those people, but they exist, and here that’s enough to make all the difference if it goes on for a very long time. If it doubles every time you run out of inhabitants of Earth around switch 32, though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve been thinking about this. I estimate a few people per 1000 would do an atrocity for no reason if they were guaranteed no consequences, and the deaths if the switch is pulled are 2(n-1) for the nth switch. The expected deaths will cross 1 somewhere in the high single-digits, then (since it’s outcome*chance), so the death minimising strategy is actually to pull yours if the chain is at least that long.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    In theory if the chain never ends this might be the only trolley problem where nobody has to die as long as nobody interacts. (If I understand it correctly)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      but if the chain never ends, you’re basically guaranteed that one of the people holding the lever down the line is a monster and will deliberately decide to kill the people, so you’re likely to do better by killing the one person now