• Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Except that it’s not cheating? It’s the system functioning as designed. The real issue is what patents are applied to, the length of time given, and the ability to renew them if you iterated on it slightly. If Corps like Disney hadn’t lobbied and litigated to push through changes to copyright and patent laws the world would be a much different place. So much is locked up behind laws designed to harvest wealth that creativity and innovation are stunted.

      Here’s a great video on a 3D printing patent troll issue.

  • PlzGivHugs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    “We’re not blocking competition, we’re just making sure no one else can get any money.”

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Nobody buys a game because they made a cool new and innovative mechanic.

    They buy it because it’s a good game and the mechanic helps that.

    If your game sucks and no one buys it despite the new mechanic, perhaps other more talented developers should be able to use that mechanic.in their games to improve the industry.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 days ago

    ‘Recovering’ development costs by using a government enforced monopoly on game mechanics.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 days ago

    Video game patents are not a way to monopolize game mechanics, but to recover development costs, say Sega, Capcom and Konami legal experts assholes being paid to defend that bullshit

    Fixed the headline

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Don’t you only get paid if someone else actually uses what you patented? I have never seen that happen with patented game mechanics. If the mechanic is patented by company X, company Y simply won’t use that mechanic. Who the hell else had playable loading screens when Namco still held a patent on them? Who currently has a nemesis system outside of the Shadow of Mordor games, which is patented by WB?

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The nemesis system wasn’t unique when it came out, plenty of games have similar mechanics, obviously there is a distinct mechanic about Shadows of Mordor that other can’t copy with the patent, but it hasn’t affected nemesis systems in other games.

      They don’t pay, because there’s usually another way to make a very similar system that doesn’t infringe.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Off the top of my head, Assassin’s creed, diablo and Far Cry 5 are recent ones.

          Depends on which specific mechanic you’re talking about, lots of games have enemies that die and come back stronger.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    Abolish all software patents. OK, I’ll compromise to a 3 year patent duration. No? So abolition it is.