It’s like the gilded age except instead of gold we get plastic.
As a nerd, I don’t like the end of the article where she says we need to get revenge on the nerds. I don’t consider any tech bro to be a nerd, and I’ve worked with a lot of them.
As a nerd, I don’t like the end of the article where she says we need to get revenge on the nerds.
I hear you, as many would I think. But realistically, I think calling tech culture into question, even beyond its manifestation in the psychotic tech CEO types, is worth while. It’s really had a dominant run both materially and culturally (a revenge as many would see it), and I think it’s worthwhile questioning the value of a lot of it, in a way I don’t think many nerds and tech people are capable of (sadly IMO).
There may be an inclination to separate the capitalism and nerdy parts. But as an industry/profession/whatever that generally tends to care a lot about itself in various ways … I think tech is disturbingly uninterested in caring about the quality of its profession beyond the bike shedding stuff let alone acting on it in any collective way. There are reasons for this, but given the dominance tech now has in the world, pushing back in the culture wholesale is justified I think.
Yeah, the tech industry tends to do things without thinking of the consequences. For example, the resistance to making software engineering a certified engineering profession like mechanical or structural engineering.
But nerds predated the tech industry, and encompass a lot more than the tech industry.
we get plastic
…in our waterways and oceans and everywhere else as microbeads
And my testicles!
“It’s time for us to start getting revenge on the nerds.” Says PS1 Hagrid.
I understand the downvotes but that was a good diss.
“A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in”
— someone called Greek Proverb.
It’s the exact opposite of these fuckers.
Also:
Ffs Guardian. It’s cringeworthy, or at a push cringey, or embarrassing, or awkward.
I fucking hate “cringe” used as an adjective (or whatever it is).
/rant
I’m only focusing on your comment about language here, and yes I’m aware that it’s a rant, but I feel the need to add some additional info because it brings me calm when I get irritated about similar things. I’m in no way coming at you or your opinion because the changes in language, like the most recent usage of “cringe,” are irritating and bothersome to me also:
I remember when I was in college, my best friend was really irritated by everyone starting to say “real” as an intensifying adverb as opposed to “really.” For example, instead of saying “I was really bothered by that situation,” people began saying, “I was real bothered by that situation.” For the most part, this didn’t change the meaning of what was said, but it did change the connotation a bit. While both sentences mean that the person was very much bothered by the situation, one sounds like a serious confession of your feelings, and the other sounds like the situation was crazy enough that itself was the cause of the discomfort. It changes the flavor of the sentence by emphasizing something else. It also changes the formality of the language. I’m not going to use “real” like that in a formal setting, but it does fit better when telling a crazy story to my friends.
I had also been taking a linguistics/grammar class at the time this came up, so I had very recently been discussing descriptive vs prescriptive grammar and what makes a language a living language as opposed to a dead one. While my knowledge of linguistics is definitely limited, I did take away that language constantly changes and adds new variations on meanings and expressions all the time. That’s not a bad thing! Without growth, our language dies. Our language adapts and twists and develops with or without our individual consent. But the vocabulary of the many is what shapes language. As much as it drives me nuts, if the majority agrees that this is the way we say something now, it now becomes correct in terms of lexicon, grammar, and usage. Otherwise, we would still be referring to “selfies” as “photos you take of yourself.”
I now consider these situations to be simply the growing pains of language. While they can be irritating, especially to those who learned to do things in a very specific way, they are necessary for the survival of our language. As much as I don’t love the idea of saying “cringe” as an adjective, it is the younger people’s way of saying “cringeworthy.” Once that is mainstream, it has then been added to the overall language’s lexicon. We either change with the times of language or risk being left in its dust. None of our lives are long enough that people will be unable to understand our version of the “old” language, but I think it’s important to try to grow along with the language. This is, at the very least, so that we can understand it, but more importantly, so we can appreciate the newest flavor of our language, even though it may be an acquired taste.
It’s easiest for my brain to put it in the perspective that I should appreciate that things are different because the very difference that bothers me is a sign of growth, not decay. The Guardian is just keeping up with the times. Maybe they’re trying a bit too hard to be hip, but I get it. It’s a case of grow or die. Should they be better than that? Probably, but I’m not sure why you’re expecting that of The Guardian. I don’t associate them with using the most professional word choice.
Most importantly, to end the story about my best friend, I began using “real” as an adverb often which started out as a way to piss off my friend just a little bit, but ended with me wanting to change as the language changed so I could experience the beauty of growth.
bro literally cambridge dictionary has added cringe as an adjective, language changes over time get over it.
adjective
informaluk/krɪndʒ/ us/krɪndʒ/
very embarrassing, because of being so bad or silly: Everything he posts on social media seems so cringe.
When you’re watching the show you constantly think “this is cringe”, but it’s completely addictive!
A dictionary represents modern usage, it doesn’t make it less ignominious to use it 8 times in one article.
yes it is soo ignominious to use common turns of phrase to convey meaning, they must be so embarassed
I’m gonna go out on a limb and say knowingly burning down the world’s future so you get to party now was and always has been the position of someone who is a fucking loser. This goes as much for current tech barons as it did for Exxon when they discovered climate change was real and covered it up because their profits mattered more than, you know, not burning the planet to a fucking cinder.
So, in other words, no you shouldn’t be shocked they’re such fucking losers because if they weren’t, they wouldn’t be angling to burn the world down so they can party. Only a true fucking loser could and would pursue that to begin with.
It’s like when former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn was caught paying boatloads of prostitutes to fuck him in an orgy, and his defense was “I was just sure all these beautiful young women wanted to have an orgy with me because I’m just so amazing and beautiful, and it never had anything to do with the vastness of my wealth and the fact that they were being highly paid to even look at my filthy ugly old body.”
You’ve gotta be some kind of fucking loser to think anyone would believe that when you’re a fucking Methuselah-lookin-ass ugly goblin like Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
They were, and always have been, losers.
What a great way to articulate what’s happening. The chuds are in control.
I knew this would find its way here. I’ve been trying to put into words how I feel about these guys lately and the author did quite a fantastic job!
How and when did he turned from looking like an ugly Roman emperor to a fat nerd with ugly glasses? I missed that part of the show.
