Of course, I’m not in favor of this “AI slop” that we’re having in this century (although I admit that it has some good legitimate uses but greed always speaks louder) but I wonder if it will suffer some kind of piracy, if it is already suffering or people simple are not interested in “pirated AI”

  • VintageGenious
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    Jailbreaking LLMs and Diffusers is a thing. But I wouldn’t call it piracy

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure those things are trained on content which was obtained without paying royalties to the creators, hence by definition pirated content - so that would count as “piracy around them”.

    On the opposite side, as far as I know the things created with Generative AI so far can’t be copyrighted, hence by definition can’t be pirated as they’ve always belonged to the Public Domain.

    As for the engines themselves, there are good fully open source options out there which can be locally installed (if you have enough memory in your graphics card) and there seem to be thriving communities around it (at least it looks like it from what bit I dipped into that stuff so far). I’m not sure if it’s at all possible to pirate the closed source engines since I expect those things are designed to be deployed to very specific server farm architectures.

  • heavydust
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    That makes no sense. Define pirated AI first.

    • Grandwolf319
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah the whole of generated AI feels like legal piracy (that they charge for) based on how they train their data

  • 31337
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Some of the “open” models seem to have augmented their training data with OpenAI and Anthropic requests (I. E. they sometimes say they’re ChatGPT or Claude). I guess that may be considered piracy. There are a lot of customer service bots that just hook into OpenAI APIs and don’t have a lot of guardrails, so you can do stuff like ask a car dealership’s customer service to write you Python code. Actual piracy would require someone leaking the model.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Not sure it it counts in any way as piracy per say, but there is at least jail broken bing’s copilot AI (Sydney version) using SydneyQT from Juzeon on github.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There already is. You can download copies of AI that are similar or better than ChatGPT from hugging face. I run different models locally to create my own useless AI slop without paying for anything.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You can just run Automatic1111 locally if you want to generate images. I don’t know what the text equivalent is though, but I’m sure there’s one out there.

    There’s no real need for pirate ai when better free alternatives exist.

    • Zikeji@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      There are quite a few text equivalents. text-generation-webui looks and feels like Automatic1111, and supports a few backends to run the LLMs. My personal favorite is open-webui for that look and feel, and then there is Silly Tavern for RP stuff.

      For generation backends I prefer ollama due to how simple it is, but there are other options.