Hey there.
As the title says, don’t you feel frustrated whenever a new video comes along and it’s just a blurry pixel doing mundane things?
15 years ago I saw something extraordinary, something that I tear up by just remembering. I won’t go into details because why would I? I’m a stranger on the internet and my experience has no weight cept for me. But I know what I saw, and I truly wonder why nobody ever caught something like that with a camera.
Video after video after images come out and all that I’m left saying to myself is “that’s not it”.
I’m just frustrated that the hallucination hypothesis is the best explanation for my sighting at this point.
how do you cope with that?
“How exactly is ignoring the scientific protocol and interpreting random things as “scientific evidence” something reasonable?”
it isn’t, as I’ve stated multiple times. your irrational fear of scientific evidence as something “unreasonable” is one of your problems.
“…those are your proofs?”
nnnope, those sound like more things you’re making up in your head.
“None of those hold to scientific standard”
you not understanding how radar, video and photos work doesn’t mean that radar, video and photo evidence isn’t real.
you are just ignorant.
“It has nothing to do with Galileo or made-up statistics.”
and yet you consistently bring them up for no reason.
weird.
“conspiracist…”
again, radar is not a conspiracy. video is not a conspiracy. these are simple recording and measurement tools that you are ignorant of.
radiation is not a conspiracy. it occurs all around you all the time.
“Not a single record on earth made it past the scientific protocol”
…you should definitely try to explain this.
I am laughing at everything you write, but I expect you trying to prove that there’s never been a “single record on Earth that made it past the scientific protocol” should be hilarious.
“If it did, it would be admitted by science.”
you doubt that video, photo and radar have been admitted by science?
are you ancient or perhaps 3 years old?
boy are you in for a surprise.
those technologies, and many others, are well documented and scientifically accepted.
what methodology do you think the screen you’re staring at right now is a product of If not the scientific process?
magic?
guesswork?
Wow, you’re actually unable to form a coherent answer at this point.
Also just a little thing, you’re the one with unfounded beliefs having the burden of the proof, not me. I can’t and don’t have to prove that your beliefs are not facts, you’re the one having to prove what you claim, and all you’ve been doing is telling me that pictures and videos are an existing technology as if it ever was in question.
If someone questioning your beliefs makes you go completely haywire then you should probably see with a professional, this is out of the scope of a discussion on lemmy.
“Wow, you’re actually unable to form a coherent answer at this point.”
That’s another one of your mistakes.
in order to receive an answer, you’ll need to ask a question.
which I understand seems very challenging for you.
“you’re the one with unfounded beliefs having the burden of the proof”
dude, you being unaware of how radar works is not my problem.
I don’t have to prove an 80 year old technology because you don’t believe in science, you have to learn how to read.
I agree you should see a professional, but they’re going to agree with me that video, photo and radar are very common technologies that you should be familiar with by this point.
established, scientific processes widely accepted by all.
you don’t like science, that’s your deal, but you are in the minority here.
everybody else agrees that radar, video and photo technologies are real.
your limitations are your own.
Are you high?
Radars and pictures work and exist, that’s pretty far from proving aliens are here.
Are you really not a troll? That’s hard to believe.
“Are you high?”
relatively, although I’m not sure what that has to do with your disbelief in scientific evidence.
oh…or are your beliefs… evolving…
“Radars and pictures work and exist”
hey! there you go!
it only took…seven comments for you to come around?
honestly, that’s pretty good.
It has to do with your inability to form a coherent conversation.
The rest of your reply proved my point.
“It has to do with your inability to form a coherent conversation.”
it’s as if you don’t even know the meaning of words.
like you keep trying to pretend my comments are not “coherent”, while all your tantrums have done is fail to counter my single logical and consistent argument that you not believing in simple scientific technologies and evidence does not render those evidences non-existent.
nobody can fault you for trying to use new words, but maybe look up their definitions first?
especially since you’ve finally admitted that the scientific technologies I’ve mentioned do exist, are widely accepted, and you’re simply ignorant of the evidence you’re trying to extrapolate falsely predicated conclusions from.
why try to climb back inside your shell?
Your hole point is basically “pictures exists so aliens are proven”, I’m not going to waste my time debating with you if that’s the extent of your “reasoning”.
Still hoping that you’re a troll, but have a good day.
“Your hole point is basically “pictures exists so aliens are proven””
not at all, but I understand how reducing a complex issue to a couple incorrectly spelled words makes things easier for you to understand.
“I’m not going to waste my time debating with you”
you keep saying that, yet persist in vomiting up senseless comments.