• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I don’t see any flaw. The meaning of that sentence is very clear.

    If the post lead with that then maybe there wouldn’t be any complaints.

    • wolframhydroxide
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It literally DOES start with that! That’s the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.

        • wolframhydroxide
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them.

          Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don’t understand the few words.