• Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    A lot of people here thinking the USA is speed running fascism here.

    No, the USA was always an inspiration to fascism (just ask the remaining Native Americans as an example).

    That’s why it was able to adopt into it so quick. Not that hard to change a car to gasoline if it was already running on diesel.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Not that hard to change a car to gasoline if it was already running on diesel.

      Is almost a good analogy, but that’s not so easy 😅

    • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Before WW2 broke out, the New York Times LOVED Mussolini. They kept pumping out articles about how much of a cool guy he was.

    • Potatar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      What if we called the original people Americans, and the newcomers immigrant Americans?

      Clarity: Native American -> American

      American -> Immigrant American

      • SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        And due to the transitive property of humans, if we follow this through to its logical conclusion then native Americans are immigrant Americans too

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Which is why “indigenous” is the best word in my opinion. Not just for the indigenous Americans, but for indigenous people the world over. It’s generally understood to mean “pre-colonial.”

          Edit: The only exception I can think of is that the Vikings settled Greenland before the Thule (who became the Greenland Inuit), but Danes are not considered indigenous and Inuit are. Maybe because the Vikings that settled there all left or died out and also maybe because the Vikings and the Thule settled different parts of Greenland and had very little contact with each other even when they could clearly see each other across a fjord. The very Christian Vikings of that era were probably quite reluctant to interact with people they saw as heathens.

        • Potatar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Not really. Those are human made concepts, so you must start from the inception of the concept of immigration. Good luck finding the exact date, since it predates written language :/

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Well since dates are human concepts as well we can just state it is immigration date 00/00/0000. Are the months or days first? That’s up to you, haha. You make a good point, but you understand what I mean. If we consider immigration only being the integration into another state permanently then we would have to say we had mostly open immigration into the U.S. until the later parts of the 1800s. The first 99 years there were no real immigration laws here. (So roughly 40% of our history had no immigration restrictions for the most part)