• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    All they can think to do

    They’re not that stupid.

    They know exactly what voters want to hear and what they want politicians to do.

    The issue is that is often the direct opposite of what their donors tell them to do. If they wanted to reach out, they’d hand AOC a megaphone or let Bernie talk about policy.

    They’re focused on “messaging” because that’s what they have control over still. They can’t change their votes or support of policies, because the oligarchs decide that for Dem leadership just like they do Republican.

    A letter by their name doesn’t make them your friend just because the other letter would make them your enemy. We need to have higher standards than just that letter, otherwise the ones with the most donations will keep winning primaries, and keep being the only other option.

    • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes.

      The dirty little secret of the DNC is that they don’t even really care about winning elections. They only want to keep the soft money flowing, and that requires never actually enacting any progressive policies, and if that means that they alienate voters and lose elections, that’s fine by them.

      In fact, they sort of prefer to lose. If they win, then they’re stuck having to go through all sorts of bizarre contortions to somehow manage to continue to fail to do the things they promise their supporters they intend to do and they’re the ones stuck with the blame when the policies they enact on the behalf of the donor class inevitably make things worse for everyone else. Bit if they lose, they don’t have to actually do anything, and they get to fundraise on the need to stop the Republicans.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Bernie is only popular with leftist voters. People just see what the average Democrat likes and think the whole country likes him. This is not the case, he wouldn’t win a national election even if nominated

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              No, you need someone more charismatic than that

              Obama won both terms easily. Even Biden won, although it was closer

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Biden only won because we were in the middle of the pandemic and the economy was in the shitter and even then it was by a razor thin margin. Obama was charismatic and had a lot of us believing change would happen in 2008 but it never really came. In 2012 he beat Romney who was also milquetoast but most of the enthusiasm for him was gone by that point.

                • iopq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  He beat Romney even harder, it was a blowout. Why can’t Democrats find a candidate that replicates this success?

                  • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I don’t think they want to if it means they’ll have to actually live up to the party’s stated ideals rather than Republican-lite ideals. That’s why they back the Bidens, Clintons, and Harris’ of the party instead of the AOCs or Sanders of the party.