The developer behind Pixelfed, Loops, and Sup, open source alternatives to Instagram, TikTok, and WhatsApp, respectively, is now raising funds on Kickstarter to fuel the apps’ further development.

The trio is part of the growing open social web, also known as the fediverse, powered by the same ActivityPub protocol used by X alternative Mastodon. The latter saw increased signups and use after the company formerly known as Twitter sold to Elon Musk in October 2022 and during the X exodus that followed the U.S. presidential election.

In the months and years following that sale, open source and decentralized apps like Mastodon and Bluesky (which uses the newer AT Protocol), have continued to grow their user bases, as people sought alternatives to centralized social media apps controlled by billionaires like Musk and Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg.

MBFC
Archive

Edit: Link to the kickstarter

    • spaduf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not really a whatsapp alternative. More like a facebook messenger alternative. It replaces and encrypts dms from mastodon, pixelfed, lemmy, etc

    • warmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Centralized. Not good. Conversations is on fdroid and is decentralized, federated, open source and uses a mature and battle tested protocol (XMPP). If I wanted something new, I would prefer Matrix over Signal.

      • astro_ray@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why are there so many downvotes? Dude said the truth. Signal, like whatsapp, is a single point of failure. It can be enshittified just like whatsapp.

          • astro_ray@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            With so many examples like twitter, reddit, Factbook, whatsapp, instagram etc. can you really blame us for not liking centralized services? Also, I don’t hate all centralized services. I love Wikipedia, Openstreetmap.org etc. Also, the outage of OSM earlier proves that single point of failure is a reason for concern.

            • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t like centralized services. I also never pretended the opposite.

              This is for me and my usage. The caveat is that not everyone is in the tech. We can look at the disastrous communication of Mastodon. They focussed and lots of people promoting it focussed too on the “decentralized argument”. This backfired. It was not clear for the public. A good strategy would have been to market Mastodon as an alternative with an easy process to create an account on the general website. Tech people would have chosen another server and do their stuffs. People would learn progressively the decentralization part and move from server to server. This takes time. We have to put great strategies in places and be patient to bring the public to the fedi.

      • Deway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        People act like we need an alternative to Whatsapp but XMPP/Jabber exists and is much older.

            • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I know, I just remember I used to use it with jabber xmpp but I think after everyone got gtalk and then everyone got cellphones everyone moved away from those types of clients

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nobody but a handful of nerds uses it though. You won’t get your grandparents and less tech literate friends to leave whatsapp in droves, simple as that.

          • Deway@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            And they’re not going to leave WhatsApp for Sup? either. All I’m saying is we’ve had an alternative for decades, even before WA was created, we don’t need another one, we need the one we already have to have more success.

        • warmaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sure, it looks great. But it doesn’t have the popularity of Matrix, which is already less popular than XMPP which has enjoyed decent adoption since it’s inception.

      • Lurker
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Matrix? Just use telepathy already! /s

        I prefer Matrix over Signal because it required personal numbers.

        • renzev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I tried using it with a friend, and it completely nuked my phone’s battery, while my friend’s phone silently killed it (likely for using too much battery). I understand that truly privacy-respecting messengers will always use slightly more power than apps that use the google notification thing, but simplex is just a complete power hog beyond any reasonable limit. Hopefully they fix it at some point, it seems like a pretty solid messenger otherwise, and their approach to privacy and anonymity is unparalleled, at least in theory.