So now we’re being forced to have poorer performance and locked into buying more expensive hardware.

I’ll have to pass on this type of crap and vote with my wallet when ray tracing still isn’t there for the majority of pc gamers.

  • germtm.@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    welcome to the death of game optimization.

    it especially sucks for Doom: The Dark Ages since both Doom 2016 and Eternal were considered very optimized for their times of release.

    • Aurix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I especially fail to see the value to drive up obsolescence. Look how the Final Fantasy XIV art team, or the Tyranny RPG expressed so much through comparatively ancient engines of the PS3 era. And for shooters we have so much visual polished fidelity, with physics, high resolution textures and dynamic lighting to create anything you want. From “Prey” (2016) to Prey (2005) I think both look amazing.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I especially fail to see the value to drive up obsolescence.

        “Can’t afford an upgrade to a high-end PC? Buy one of our Xboxes.” --Microsoft

    • tekato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      How does requiring a GPU feature translate into bad optimization?

        • tekato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          That link explains nothing, it just tells you what people are using. Why does a game requiring a GPU feature mean, by your own words, the death of optimization?

          • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I’ll chime in for the other commenter.

            Having ray tracing be “a minimum requirement” is batshit insane. Just make it an option and don’t require it for everyone.

            Ray tracing is not that widely available, so you shouldn’t just force it onto your whole player base.

            And while this might not sound like an optimization thing, it really looks like they couldn’t be bothered to develop their game with and without the ray tracing features.

            Edit: looking more into the numbers, they are all insane.

            • 8 cores with 16 threads as minimum?
            • 16GB RAM?
            • and a 100GB SSD again?

            I don’t really play AAA titles nowadays, but this is aweful and far from optimized. Doom 2016 needed half of that for every single metric!

            • kungfuratte@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Doom 2016 needed half of that for every single metric!

              On the other hand that was almost a decade ago.

              • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                to be fair graphics havent advanced as much in the last decade compared with the previous one to justify higher and higher requirements.

                • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Titanfall 2 is 9 years old and looks pretty damned good compared to recent releases. The biggest jump I have seen in graphics was HL:Alyx and a lot of that was VR letting you press your eyeballs up against the windows to see the sweaty hand prints.

                  There is plenty of room for publishers improve without leaning on new hardware features.

              • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yes, but the tech has not advanced that much since then. Also the game probably doesn’t look twice as good.

                Tbh. the game needing 8 cores is the most outrageous of the list, but the ray tracing is a close second, since that could easily be toggleable.

                • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Depending on how a game is made, no, ray casting may not be “easily toggleable”

                  You wouldn’t complain about games requiring DirectX 12, or requiring DirectX 11, 10, whatever, in the past, so why complain about ray tracing? Modern games require modern GPU features, that is nothing new.

                  • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I totally complained about games needing dx12! I had to buy my current video card to meet that demand!

                    I have been planning on upgrading, but my budget is about $400. A RX 7600 looks like it might fit that budget.

                  • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Maybe I wouldn’t, but I would definitely complain if this was a very new feature available in higher end GPUs.

                    DX12 is also software, it’s easily update able and modern hardware supports it.

                    But in the end I don’t give a fuck, since I just won’t play doom then.

                  • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    In a doom game ray tracing should not be used for registering hits, since most if not all of the projectiles are visible and fly slower than light.

            • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Nobody buying $80 games doesn’t have all this shit. You guys are living in a bubble. Everyone has rtx these days. The ones that don’t weren’t going to buy Doom anyway.

    • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not sure why you are so worried. Based on those requirements a Radeon rx 6800 should be able to do Ultra 4K @ 60. The main differentiator seems to be vram.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not sure what games you play but they haven’t been optimized for jack shit in the last 10 years.