• LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    26% down from a wildly inflated peak isn’t all that earth shattering tbh.

    However the growth in popularity and price drop with synthetic diamonds - that’s what’s newsworthy here.

    • Croquette
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      In the land of ever increasing red line, any stagnation is bad, any drop is catastrophic.

  • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bottom falls out on commodity made artifically rare through imperailism and corruption. Is this the part where I’m supposed to feel bad for De Beers?

    • sunbytes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The free market manages to solve a problem.

      I wonder how much money it’s going to cost the diamond lobby to un-solve it.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be fair, diamonds are indeed rare on earth. But what made diamond price come crashing is because we now managed to synthesise the diamonds. These “fake” diamonds flooded the market. This is good news so that we don’t have to rely on exploitative extraction of the mineral.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’re not especially rare, not even gem-quality ones. For several generations, almost every married woman in a western country had a diamond on her finger of some size. They found plenty of them to serve that market. The mines created artificial scarcity by colluding together.

        If lab grown had never happened, diamond mines might not have been able to serve industrial customers. Industrial customers don’t care how it looks as long as it cuts, and so lab grown has been good enough for decades. Thus, you can get a two-pack 4.5 inch diamond angle grinder wheel at Home Depot for around twenty bucks.

      • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also because newer generations just aren’t sold on diamonds being a luxury item anymore. Your average Joe just isn’t paying their rent or more on a diamond engagement/wedding ring like they used to because, well, that’s their rent payment or mortgage for something that’s gonna lose value the second they walk out of the store.

  • knexcar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thank goodness, maybe I’ll finally be able to buy a diamond pickaxe for what few emeralds I have. I’ve been having to use stone tools in this economy and I’d really like some obsidian for a nether portal.

    • sploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s nothing wrong with orderly carbon. There’s more than a few things wrong with Debeers

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        yeah, like the heat conduction thing is super cool, and the ability to scratch literally anything, while not particularly useful, is still pretty neat

        I bet once diamonds get cheap enough CPU manufacturers will start using them as heat spreaders on their high end chips

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Scratching things is super useful. We have so many tools based on exactly that principle

          • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes, there just isn’t all that much use I would get from it personally, and I think diamond tools are already not all that expensive.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      The rock is quite useful as an industrial tool. It’s when you cut it in to a fancy shape and wear it that it’s pretty useless.

      We use diamonds to test the hardness of materials, grind really hard things smaller, orient and locate specialized cutting tools, and cut through really hard things. Hell we sell garnet by the barrel to help cut through regular materials. Orderly carbon or, in many cases orderly aluminum oxide, is something we need a lot of. The price going down on those is actually good for manufacturing.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        But the industrial rocks are 90% manmade, the stonesetter diamonds were mined with slave labour or close to it, and people probably died for them.

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I own twns of thousands of diamonds. most of them are embedded in metal plates and I use them to sharpen chisels. A few are on little wheels I use to cut steel.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    i never understood why a mined diamond has a bigger value than an artificially made one when the only difference is the suffering of the workers. ppl who like diamonds are stupid.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The first thing DeBeers tried was “artificial diamonds have imperfections, you want a real rock that’s selected to be as perfect as possible”. Then the artificial industry made diamonds so good that you could only tell the difference from the lack of imperfections. Then DeBeers marketing changed to “it’s too perfect, you want something that has the small imperfections of a natural process”.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is this idea that seems to be really pervasive that natural is always better. And it’s not true so often. A common example I like to give is that natural almond extract contains cyanide and artificial almond extract does not. No, it isn’t enough cyanide to kill you, but I would say no cyanide is better than some cyanide.

      And a lot of those “natural is always better” people would happily take fentanyl over willow bark if they were in agony.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Same reason diamonds are valued in the first place. Marketing campaigns tricking the gullible majority and most of the rest conforming to not stand out and cause issues for themselves.

      • SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Diamonds do make sense as gemstones because of their hardness. They’ll stay scratch free for life. But ya, the diamond industry is garbage.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Maybe, but realistically, most jewelry will have them inlaid in gold anyway, which is not hard at all. So you need to take care not to scratch it regardless of what gem is used.

          Also, many other gems are harder then steel which is about the hardest thing your jewelry would come into contact with.

          So I would say the benefit is minor.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re too common to be truly valuable, though, and that’s before factoring in that you can just make them now.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      For a long time (and maybe still currently I don’t know) they weren’t able to make diamonds bigger like people want. So for a small diamond it might not make any sense, but there was a point where ones we made weren’t meeting what people wanted.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        synthetic diamond sizes keep getting bigger, but it is much harder to make them I think

        As of 2023 the heaviest synthetic diamond ever made weighs 30.18 ct (6.0 g); the heaviest natural diamond ever found weighs 3167 ct (633.4 g). Wikipedia

        That would be 1.7 vs 181 cm3

  • Loce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    You know, it must be that food and rent are a bit higher priority than the pressure stones… especially when more and more people cant afford those… food and rent i mean.

  • paequ2@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lab-grown rocks

    When I was getting married a few years ago, I remember thinking fuck real diamonds lab-grown are literally the same thing. I remember getting some push back from some weirdos about how “real” diamonds are some how better or how people will think I’m a cheapskate or how people will feel bad for my wife…

    Well, fast forward a few years and literally nobody cares, thinks about, or has said anything negative about my wife’s ring. We are both 1000000% happy and satisfied with the decision to buy lab grown.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      We said fuck diamonds entirely, even lab grown, and even had to go out of our way to find something that didnt have diamonds on it somehow

      • paequ2@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        3 days ago

        Fucking noice, dude. 👏 Honestly, yeah, why even diamonds. They brainwashed us good.

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I got us bare tungsten carbide bands. If “Diamonds are forever”, then tungsten carbide is 9.5/10ths of forever, and it’s the whole band instead of just a small easily-detachable part of it. More practically, it won’t get beat to hell like the white gold ring from my first marriage. Plus, if I ever need a really strong connector for jury-rigging something, I’m now carrying one with me at all times!

          • voracitude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            So are diamonds, but hey - don’t pollute my symbol with your facts! As far as romance is concerned, hardness == durability, end of story :P

    • Imgonnatrythis
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      When it’s time for children I recommend lab grown as well!

    • Obelix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      We decided on some cheap silver rings. We really didn’t want to carry around something extremely valuable everywhere. Go swimming and lose 5000€ in the lake? Do some yard work and lose your diamond ring there? Getting mugged and the robber is getting something really expensive? No, thank you.

      Expensive wedding rings & jewelery did make sense in the past when women were not allowed their own money, bank accounts etc. as a way to escape an abusive husband. Pawn your expensive wedding ring, get cash for the getaway. But we’re not living in the 50s, my wife has her own bank account, is earning her own money, so no need for something like that.

      • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        We did the same. Some silver bands from a local artist.

        Paid off when one was lost. The artist was still available for a new order.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        We decided on some cheap silver rings. We really didn’t want to carry around something extremely valuable everywhere. Go swimming and lose 5000€ in the lake? Do some yard work and lose your diamond ring there? Getting mugged and the robber is getting something really expensive? No, thank you.

        Yeah, on a similar note it is really nice to finally have a new phone, but I’ll miss the fact that losing my old phone would only set me back $50.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I gave my wife an engagement ring with natural diamonds, but it belonged to my great-grandmother who died in the 1940s, so I didn’t feel that there was an ethical issue.

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve unfortunately lost my wedding ring in palladium. My wife is planning to offer me a new one but this time I want a steel ring made by a local jeweler.

      Not because it is cheaper but because I am using my money in the right place.

      Precious metal/stones is a social flex saying “Look ! I can afford the labor of X African slaves that have worked in the mine to extract this mineral” (plus the ecological impact of mining)

      I’d rather spend money to buy the labor of a local artisan than buy African slave labor through a myriad of intermediaries

    • idunnololz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same. My SO’s ring looks great and easily looks 20 to 50x what it actually costs. We get to spend the savings on a honey moon with no compromises.