The Council on American Islamic Relations said the allegation was that the teacher had remarked, “I do not negotiate with terrorists,” when the Palestinian American student asked for a seat change.

Recent U.S. incidents involving children include the attempted drowning of a 3-year-old Palestinian American girl in Texas and the fatal stabbing of a 6-year-old Palestinian American boy in Illinois.

Other incidents include the stabbing of a Palestinian American man in Texas, the beating of a Muslim man in New York, a violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters in California and the shooting of three Palestinian American students in Vermont.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Calling a Palestinian child a terrorist isn’t fucking colloquial. Why would you even suggest such a thing? What a bigoted fucking thing to say. There’s nothing flimsy here at all.

    Pretending like it isn’t bigoted by divorcing it from context is fucking stupid. Without context, calling a child a monkey is fine. With context, calling a black child a monkey is bigoted as fuck. And I’m sure you’re not stupid, so you know that and are just trying to excuse what this awful racist teacher did.

    Or do you call black children monkeys because calling a white child a monkey isn’t racist?

    • testfactor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think calling a black child a monkey without that being part of an established pattern or without reason would be racist, sure.

      But if a whole kindergarten class was acting crazy, and a teacher said they were acting like moneys, and that class happened to have a black child in it, I wouldn’t think they were racist for calling that black child a monkey.

      And if a news story ran that had the headline, “racist teacher calls black child a monkey,” and those were the facts presented, I’d call it rage bait.

      So the question of whether this child was singled out and called a terrorist with racial intent, or we just have a teacher using a normal phrase with no racial intent seems a relevant point.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Where do you people come from where “I don’t negotiate with terrorists” is a normal phrase that teachers say to children?

        I don’t even know any adults who have said something like that to each other in years.

        The kid wouldn’t even have gotten the reference because they were born many years after Bush was in office.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Where do you people come from where “I don’t negotiate with terrorists” is a normal phrase that teachers say to children?

          I hear it often enough, I’m from MA. I don’t know what to tell you, but it’s a common expression.

          Here’s the scenario, often as an adult you have to tell children what to do, (eat your dinner, get dressed, we have to leave now, etc). Sometimes they start making ultimatums or threats over issues that really aren’t up for debate, “No! I won’t do X unless Y!” - that kind of thing. It’s at that point one might use that expression, it’s really not uncommon.

          Hey, maybe the phrase isn’t in your normal vocabulary, but you’re going to have to accept that it is in a lot of other people’s normal vocabulary. You don’t have to like it, but it’s a fact, and it’s generally best to just accept facts, cause you don’t really have other options.

          So given that this is a normal thing to say, it was still a pretty massive fuck up. Being put on leave is probably an appropriate response. Was it racist? I’m like 85% sure no.

        • testfactor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean, I come from a place that that’s a normal thing people say. And I’d think I’m as likely to say it to a child as “I’ll be back,” or “clever girl,” or “what we have here is a failure to communicate,” or any number of other referential phrases that a child is unlikely to understand the reference to.

          But maybe you’re right it’s an age/generational thing. It’s definitely a phrase still in the zeitgeist of people my age, but maybe less so in a younger demographic? Maybe that’s why there’s a skew in the comments, where some of us see it as a phrase as common and normal as “we’re gonna need a bigger boat,” and some think it’s super out of left field and weird.

          But the child not getting the reference is immaterial. Part of learning language is learning what phrases are in the zeitgeist. It’s not weird for me to use any of the above phrases with a child, even if they haven’t seen any of the things they’re from.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t know what age you are, but I am 47 and I have not heard that phrase in years.

            And you’re right, it’s immaterial whether or not the child gets it. The material part is a teacher insulting a child. Racist, not racist, it is absolutely inappropriate either way.

            • testfactor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              Have you ever heard that phrase used as an insult? I’ve only ever heard it used as a joking way to say “no.” Especially in cases where the person is being bullheaded about something.

              I’ve literally never heard that phrase used in a pejorative way.

                • testfactor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Maybe this is purely cultural/regional then. I grew up in an area without a large Muslim population. Perhaps the phrase was used pejoratively elsewhere.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Well this teacher is somewhere with Muslims, so maybe they should figure out how to be a little fucking culturally sensitive with the people in her class.

                    We don’t even know how old this kid was. It could have been a seven-year-old. What seven-year-old would even understand that was not insulting if you called them a terrorist? They don’t have that sort of ability to reason yet.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You are internally ignoring my point, notably that the racial aspect you want to focus on may not be related AT ALL to the usage of the phrase.

      You are assuming that race is related, and it might be, but the phrase is used all the time without actual terrorism being involved, so blindly assuming it is means you instantly discount alternative scenarios without considering them. Just because there appears to be a link on the sirface, that doesn’t mean there actually is.

      No point in trying to discuss it further since you clearly aren’t actually trying to have a real conversation about it.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I am not ignoring your point, I am just disagreeing with it. But your idea that people who disagree with you don’t want to discuss things with you is noted.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s not because of disagreement, but your apparent inability to even consider a reality where the racial aspect isn’t involved here. And since that’s the entire basis of what I’m discussing, would mean you aren’t intending to have a real discussion.

          Not surprising given your other posts elsewhere in the fediverse. You never seem to try to consider alternative perspectives when people post them, just insisting they’re wrong for various reasons often including various logical fallacies. So I’m not exactly surprised you’re doing the same here.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I can consider that reality. I just don’t think that reality is even remotely likely in this case.

            Your lying about me (couching it in “seem to”) and your unprovoked incivility are also both noted.

            I do not give bigotry the benefit of the doubt and try to be nice to the person being bigoted. Especially when it’s a teacher being bigoted to a student, something that happens constantly. Something that I saw myself regularly in school.

            Edit: Incidentally, this is a whole lot like people excusing Elon’s Nazi salute as a Roman salute or him being “autistic” and getting too excited.

            • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ehh except it is something people say and when pointed at children is a cheeky acknowledgement of how children are completely unreasonable sometimes.

              It’s very common to refer to children (most often toddlers) as terrorists. Ive seen it countless times in mom groups and it never has any hate behind it.

              Elon is a Nazi because he does Nazi salutes and courts favor with Nazis, and reposts nazi propaganda, calling it true. It’s not comparable.

              When conservatives say we have “woke mind virus” this thread is exactly what they are talking about. It’s embarrassing watching something so trivial get blown into some hateful act.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Please show me an example of a teacher calling a child a terrorist. If it is very common, like you say, you can show evidence of it.

                I have never called my child a terrorist, nor would I, because that’s fucking sick. None of the parents I know ever have either. Terrorists murder people.

              • HellsBelleOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                You truly believe that calling a child a terrorist is trivial?

                Whoo boy, are you in for an awakening.

                  • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    Go find a child with their parent on the street (one that you don’t know), and call them a terrorist and their parent a terrorist sympathetiser.