• FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    It is a point of controversy whether non-Muslims should be made to follow Islamic law

    No controversy about it at all. The more that religious fascists insist on controlling others, the more it’s essential that people are free to express ridicule towards them.

    I suppose the equivalent might be performing a play in which Christ is a child abuser or some musical parody of Auschwitz?

    Those expressions should be avoidable though. So that if someone didn’t want to see it they are free to find something else to do. Harassing people (burning a Qur’an outside their home) would be wrong.

    But saying I can’t do something just because that’s a rule for you? Fuck that. Get the matches.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think that the article is saying that it’s a point of theological controversy. I.e. not all Muslims have an interpretation that non-Muslims are obliged to follow this rule.

        • FantasticDonkey@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          I‘m Muslim and I have a huge mostly Muslim family and a large friend circle and I consume mostly Arabic media. We honestly don’t know who you are, we don’t care about you and we have better things to do than trying to enforce any laws on you.

          Fun fact I have some atheists in my family and we did not behead or stone them. This might surprise you, but we have better things to do.