qaz@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDiplomacyEnglish · edit-215 hours agoTariffslemmy.worldimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1328arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1322arrow-down1imageTariffslemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDiplomacyEnglish · edit-215 hours agomessage-square67fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMothmanDelorian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·4 hours agoYes, it would because you have a candidate going out of their way to prevent a fair election from happening. This is intro level poli sci stuff that you are not getting here
minus-squarepiccololinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoMore like resetting the election forcing both parties to pick new candidates.
minus-squareMothmanDelorian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 hours agoWhich we don’t do either unless there is demonstrable proof that the election was fraudulent and we don’t have. You keep making the authoritarian/dictatorial choice that doesn’t align with the rule of law. Why?
Yes, it would because you have a candidate going out of their way to prevent a fair election from happening.
This is intro level poli sci stuff that you are not getting here
More like resetting the election forcing both parties to pick new candidates.
Which we don’t do either unless there is demonstrable proof that the election was fraudulent and we don’t have.
You keep making the authoritarian/dictatorial choice that doesn’t align with the rule of law. Why?